Filters

2020 - 20242
Reset filters

Settings

Department: Atılım UniversityPublisher: Mosby-elsevier

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain
    (Mosby-elsevier, 2024) Acet, Nagihan; Guzel, Nevin Atalay; Gunendi, Zafer
    Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 24
    Citation - Scopus: 29
    The Effectiveness of Oropharyngeal Exercises Compared To Inspiratory Muscle Training in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    (Mosby-elsevier, 2020) Erturk, Nurel; Calik-Kutukcu, Ebru; Arikan, Hulya; Savci, Sema; Inal-Ince, Deniz; Caliskan, Hakan; Ardic, Sadik
    Background: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and oropharyngeal exercises (OE) have different advantages and disadvantages and a comparison of these modalities has been recommended. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of IMT and OE on important outcomes for patients with OSAS. Methods: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty-one clinically stable OSAS patients not receiving CPAP therapy were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in the IMT group (n = 15) trained with a threshold loading device 7 days/week for 12 weeks. Patients in the OE group (n = 14) practiced exercises 5 days/week for 12 weeks. Twelve patients served as control group. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory muscle strength, snoring severity and frequency (Berlin Questionnaire), daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; ESS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), impact of sleepiness on daily life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire; FOSQ), and fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale; FSS) were evaluated before and after the interventions. Results: AHI and sleep efficiency did not change significantly in any of the groups. Significant decreases in snoring severity and frequency, FSS and PSQI total scores were found in the IMT and OE groups after the treatments (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in neck and waist circumference and significant improvement in respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) in IMT group compared to control group (p < 0.05). The%MEPpred value and FOSQ total score significantly increased and ESS score reduced after the treatment in OE group compared to control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results indicate that both OE and IMT rehabilitation interventions are applicable in rehabilitation programs for OSAS patients who do not accept CPAP therapy. Our findings could lead to increase these methods' use among rehabilitation professionals and decrease in cost of CPAP treatment in OSAS. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.