Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Mosby-elsevier

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant.

Description

Keywords

Physical Therapy Modalities, Postural Balance, Proprioception, Neck Pain, Range of Motion, Adult, Male, Manipulation, Spinal, Neck Pain, Middle Aged, Proprioception, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Cervical Vertebrae, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Postural Balance, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Measurement

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q3

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volume

47

Issue

5

Start Page

175

End Page

186

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

PubMed : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 18

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.68382306

Sustainable Development Goals

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo