Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

Loading...

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant.

Description

Keywords

Physical Therapy Modalities, Postural Balance, Proprioception, Neck Pain, Range of Motion, Adult, Male, Manipulation, Spinal, Neck Pain, Middle Aged, Proprioception, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Cervical Vertebrae, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Postural Balance, Physical Therapy Modalities, Pain Measurement

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Volume

47

Issue

5

Start Page

175

End Page

186

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 3

PubMed : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 27

SCOPUS™ Citations

3

checked on Jun 01, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

3

checked on Jun 01, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Jun 01, 2026

Downloads

6

checked on Jun 01, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.70

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available