Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

dc.contributor.author Acet, Nagihan
dc.contributor.author Guzel, Nevin Atalay
dc.contributor.author Gunendi, Zafer
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Acet, Nagihan] Atilim Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye; [Guzel, Nevin Atalay] Gazi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye; [Gunendi, Zafer] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.011
dc.identifier.endpage 186 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0161-4754
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 39466206
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85207748335
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q1
dc.identifier.startpage 175 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.011
dc.identifier.volume 47 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001381569600001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q3
dc.institutionauthor Acet, Nagihan
dc.institutionauthor Acet, Nagihan
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mosby-elsevier en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 1
dc.subject Physical Therapy Modalities en_US
dc.subject Postural Balance en_US
dc.subject Proprioception en_US
dc.subject Neck Pain en_US
dc.subject Range of Motion en_US
dc.title Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 1
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 72501931-4241-4a6d-b101-53672b671e26
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 72501931-4241-4a6d-b101-53672b671e26

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception Cervical Mobilization-Q1.pdf
Size:
629.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections