Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain

dc.contributor.authorAcet, Nagihan
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Nevin Atalay
dc.contributor.authorGunendi, Zafer
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.available2024-12-05T20:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Acet, Nagihan] Atilim Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye; [Guzel, Nevin Atalay] Gazi Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye; [Gunendi, Zafer] Gazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.011
dc.identifier.endpage186en_US
dc.identifier.issn0161-4754
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39466206
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207748335
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage175en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.09.011
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001381569600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.institutionauthorAcet, Nagihan
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-elsevieren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.subjectPostural Balanceen_US
dc.subjectProprioceptionen_US
dc.subjectNeck Painen_US
dc.subjectRange of Motionen_US
dc.titleEffects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections