6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 2Incidence of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries and Identification of Risk Factors in the Neonatal Unit(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2024) Yarkiner, Zalihe; Bahar, Arzu; Sonmez, Munevver; Kapan, Emine; Sahin, Simge; Kostekci, Ezgi; Erdeve, OmerAim: This study was conducted to investigate the incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) and the risk factors influencing their occurrence in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Method: This study is a prospective, descriptive study. The research was conducted with 116 newborns between June 1, 2022, and June 1, 2023. Newborns who stayed in the neonatal intensive care unit for at least 24 h were observed daily for medical device-related pressure injuries under and around each medical device throughout their stay in the intensive care unit. The "Case Report Form," "MDRPIs Monitoring Form," "Braden Q scale for children," National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Grading, and Glasgow Coma Scale were used in the research. Results: The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries is 35.3 % (41/116). It was found that 38.1 % (16/42) of medical device-related pressure injuries developed due to Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) probes, and 33.5 % (14/42) developed due to medical devices related to the respiratory system. In terms of anatomical location, 38.1 % occurred on the forehead, and 23.8 % on the arm/leg. The difference between birth weight, gestational age, development of MDRPIs in newborns receiving sedation and inotropes was found to be statistically significant. Regression analysis identified gestational age (p = 0.040, OR = 0.795, 95%CI = [0.632-1.000]) as an independent risk factor for the occurrence of medical device-related pressure injuries. Conclusions: The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in newborns was relatively high in this study, with gestational age being the most significant risk factor for MDRPIs formation. It is crucial for neonatal intensive care nurses to consider associated risk factors while providing newborn care and implement appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of MDRPIs.Article Challenges Faced by Pediatric Patients With Multiple Sclerosis During Disease Progression and Treatment: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Turkiye(Asean Neurological Assoc, 2025) Yuksel, Didem; Yardimci, FigenBackground & Objective: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic and progressive disease characterized by inflammation, demyelination and degeneration of the central nervous system. This study aimed to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of children with multiple sclerosis. Methods: The cross-sectional study was collected data from 120 children who met the research criteria and were under follow-up at 7 hospitals in T & uuml;rkiye between August 2021 and February 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Ege University. The researchers developed the "The Sociodemographic Form "used in the study by based on a comprehensive literature review and previous research experiences. The form was used according to expert opinion. Results: The study included 120 eligible patients, of whom 71.2% were girls. The mean age (+/- SD) at disease onset was 13.6 +/- 2.2 years, while the mean age at the time of the study was 15.7 +/- 1.5 years. Most of the participants were high school students (84.2%), and 53.3% resided in metropolitan areas. All participants were receiving disease-modifying therapy. The study found that 67.5% of the children had school absenteeism due to the disease. Furthermore, 75% of the children experienced supratentorial symptoms, with 50% presented with optic symptoms, and 37.5% exhibiting brainstem symptoms prior to diagnosis. Drug-related side effects were reported in 58.3% of children. Additionally,99.2% of the children received information about the disease. Furthermore, 75% of the children experienced challenges during the disease and treatment process. Among these children who encountered difficulties, 52.5% reported psychological problems, 42.5% experienced side effects due to medication, 42.5% had difficulty accessing accurate and sufficient information about disease and treatment management, 32.5% encountered social and school-related issues, and 5.8% had concerns related to the clinical environment. Conclusion: Childhood multiple sclerosis is more prevalent among girls, particularly in the relapsing-remitting form. The most commonly used treatments for pediatric multiple sclerosis include interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate. The findings of this study indicate that a significant proportion of participating children encountered challenges during the disease and treatment process, with more than half experiencing drug-related side effects. These challenges underscore the potential negative impact on treatment adherence in this population.Article Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Treatment Management Adherence Scale for Children With Multiple Sclerosis(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2024) Yuksel, Didem; Yardimci, FigenBackground: Pediatric multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disease affecting the central nervous system in children and adolescents The aim of this correlational, comparative study was to develop an assessment scale for adherence to treatment management in pMS. Methods: Two measurement tools were used to develop a scientifically sound tool to assess adherence in pediatric patients (12-18 years) diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). Cases of pMS (n = 120) in 7 hospitals in Turkey were included between August 2021-February 2022. The tools were a "Sociodemographic and Disease-Related Information" and a newly developed "Treatment Management Adherence Scale for Children with Multiple Sclerosis". The form and questionnaire were completed by the children through online using the Zoom platform in approximately 10 min. The questionnaire on adherence contains 16 items related to the disease and treatment, scored in a 5-point Likert type. Face validity was established by pretesting with 20 children, and construct validity was established using the statistical methods of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. For the reliability of the scale, Cronbach's Alpha and omega coefficients, item test correlation values, split-half, test-retest techniques were used. Results: There were 120 eligible patients, 71.2 % girls, with mean age (fSD) 13,6 f 2,2 years at disease onset and 15,7 f 1,5 at the time of the study, all under disease-modifying therapy. The sample size and items were sufficient to conduct a factor analysis. The Cronbach's Alpha and Omega value was 0.75, indicating participants' opinions were consistent across items. The mean content validity index was 0.93, showing the scale represented the measured data, and the exploratory factor analysis showed the scale measures adherence in 55 % of patients (desired figures: >0.80 and 40-60 % respectively). The 16 items of the questionnaire were grouped into 4 dimensions. These dimensions were termed 'physiological', 'self-concept', 'role function' and 'interdependence', in line with different styles of adaptation. The total score can be between 16 and 80, with higher scores indicating strong adherence to treatment. The mean total score of 54,3 f 9,53 (min=31, max= 75) in this study was in the "moderate adherence" range. Conclusions: This new scale is the first to assess adherence in pMS. The study supports its validity, reliability, and likelihood to address adjustment issues in children and adolescents with MS accurately and can be recommended for clinical use.Article Citation - WoS: 10Citation - Scopus: 10The Effect of Knowledge Levels of Intensive Care Nurses About Pressure Injuries on Their Attitude Toward Preventing Pressure Injuries(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2023) Korkmaz, Serap; Sönmez, Münevver; Sonmez, Munevver; Kisacik, Oznur Gurlek; Sönmez, Münevver; Nursing; NursingABS T R A C T Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the current knowledge levels of intensive care nurses about pressure injuries and their attitudes toward preventing pressure injuries, and to reveal the relationship between these variables. Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 152 nurses, working in the Adult Intensive Care Units of a Training and Research Hospital. Data were collected between 10.08.2021 and 31.11.2021 with the Patient Information Form, Modified Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test and Attitude toward Pressure Injury Prevention Scale. Frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, multiple logistic regression analysis and the structural equation modeling technique were used in the analysis of the study data. Results: The mean age of the nurses was 25.82 & PLUSMN; 3.42 years, 86.2% of them were female and 67.1% of them had a bachelor's degree. Total mean score of the Modified Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test of the intensive care nurses was found to be 32.58 & PLUSMN; 6.58. The knowledge score of 113 out of 152 nurses was & GE;60% or above. The total mean score of the Attitude toward Pressure Injury Prevention Scale was 42.00 & PLUSMN; 5.70 and a total of 76.97% (117 participants) of them were found to score 75% or above on the scale. The results of the regression analysis showed that educational degree, and status of having training about pressure injuries did not affect the total mean score of the Knowledge Test and the Attitude Scale. However, it revealed that the frequency of encoun-tering a patient with pressure injuries in the unit where they work has affected the total mean score of the scales significantly (p < 0.05). As per the results of the structural equation model, the Modified Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test scores of the nurses were found to have a statistically significant effect on the scores of the Attitude toward Pressure Injury Prevention Scale (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed that intensive care unit nurses had a positive attitude toward Pressure Injury Prevention and their knowledge was sufficient and that as the Modified Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test scores increase, their positive attitude toward Pressure Injury Prevention also increases.Article Citation - WoS: 14Citation - Scopus: 15Incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries in the intensive care unit and related risk factors(Elsevier Sci Ltd, 2023) Kudu, Aslihan Aydim; Tasdemir, Nurten; Sonmez, MuenevverAim: At present, physicians employ medical devices extensively in the treatment of numerous diseases and in the care and follow-up of patients. However, these medical devices are a potential cause of pressure injuries.The study aimed to investigate the incidence and affecting risk factors of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) in an adult intensive care unit.Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal descriptive/analytical and cross-sectional study. The researchers conducted this study with 213 intensive care patients between 15.06.2021 and 15.12.2021. The skin and mucosa under and around each medical device were observed once a day for MDRPIs during the stay of patients who had been hospitalized in the intensive care unit for at least 24 h. The data were collected using Patient Information Form developed by the researchers based on the literature, Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Monitoring Form, the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator (Jackson/Cubbin BARHATr)-Turkish Version, the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Pressure Injury Staging System and the Glasgow Coma Scale.Results: The incidence of MDRPIs was 28.6% (61/213). The study revealed that 48.4% (46/95) of these injuries were caused by medical devices for respiratory system, 26.3% (25/95) by devices for gastrointestinal and genitourinary system. The study also revealed that 70.5% of MDRPIs occurred on the skin and 29.5% on the mucosal membrane, and that 82.1% of the MDRPIs occurring on the skin were at Stage 1. In terms of anatomical location, 21.1% of these injuries developed on the fingers and 13.7% on the mouth/lip. In multivariate analysis, parenteral + enteral (p = 0.006, OR = 0.083, 95%CI = [0.014-0.497]) and oral nutrition (p = 0.037, OR = 0.210, 95%CI = [0.049-0.908]), a higher number of devices (nine or more) (p = 0.002, OR = 5.387, 95%CI = [1.840-15.772]) and the duration of device wear (p < 0.05) were identified as independent risk factors for the occurrence of MDRPIs.Conclusions: The study showed that the incidence of MDRPIs was relatively high and was associated with various factors. It is critical for intensive care nurses, who encounter MDRPIs more frequently, to consider these factors while caring for their patients and to take appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of these injuries.Article Citation - WoS: 51Citation - Scopus: 51Hopelessness, Death Anxiety, and Social Support of Hospitalized Patients With Gynecologic Cancer and Their Caregivers(Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019) Uslu-Sahan, Fatma; Terzioglu, Fusun; Koc, GultenBackground Gynecologic cancer can create hopelessness and death anxiety and alter the lifestyle of the affected women and their caregivers. Perceived social support may facilitate coping with this illness. Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether hospitalized patients with gynecologic cancer and their caregivers differ in feelings of hopelessness and death anxiety and how those conditions may be related to their social support. Methods Two hundred patients with gynecologic cancer and their 200 caregivers from 1 university hospital were enrolled in this descriptive correlational study. Study measures included a demographic form, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Thorson-Powell's Death Anxiety Scale. Data were analyzed using Student t test, Pearson correlation test, and linear regression analyses. Results Patients had higher hopelessness and death anxiety compared with caregivers (P < .001). Patients' perceived social support explained 35% of the total variance in hopelessness and 28% of the variance in death anxiety; caregivers' perceived social support explained 40% of the total variance in hopelessness and 12% of the variance in death anxiety. Conclusion Patients felt hopelessness and death anxiety in greater rates than caregivers. Social support had a significant effect on hopelessness and death anxiety of patients and their caregivers.
