2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Article Fistulectomy and Primary Sphincteroplasty for Transsphincteric Fistula(Coll Physicians & Surgeons Pakistan, 2025) Emral, Ahmet Cihangir; Gulen, Merter; Ege, BahadirObjective: To evaluate the results of patients treated with fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty for uncomplicated perianal fistula. Study Design: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Medicana International Hospital affiliated with Atilim University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkiye, from January 2020 to September 2023. Methodology: In this study, patients who were operated on for perianal fistula between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively examined. Data were obtained retrospectively. All patients underwent preoperative perianal MRI. Clinical notes were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) by physical examination. All patients were followed up on the first postoperative day, 1st week, 1st and 3rd postoperative months. Results: A total of 44 patients who underwent fistulectomy with primary sphincteroplasty were included in the study. Twenty-six patients (59.1%) had a history of perianal abscesses. It was observed that 34 (77.3%) of the patients had posterior, 7 (15.9%) anterior, and 3 (6.8%) lateral fistulas. A total of 3 patients (6.8%) were observed to have minor worsening in their incontinence scores. There was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative 3rd month Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score values of the patients (CCIS mean 1.6 vs. 1.7, respectively, p >0.05). Recurrence was observed in 1 patient (2.3%) during follow-ups. Conclusion: Fistulectomy with primary sphincteroplasty is an effective and reliable method to preserve anal continence and improve quality of life.Article Breast Cancer Management During the Covid Pandemic(Coll Physicians & Surgeons Pakistan, 2024) Sariyildiz, Gulcin Turkmen; Ayhan, Fikriye FigenObjective: To explore the impact of COVID-19 among both the newly diagnosed patients and patients under follow-up for breast cancer by focusing on patients' accessibility to management and comparing the distribution of them before and during pandemic. Study Design: Single -centric retrospective study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Atilim University, Medicana International Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from March 2018 to 2022. Methodology: The data were collected to analyse numbers and distributions of physician visits regarding breast cancer. Results: The mean age of patients was 55.98 +/- 12.60 years. The percentages of newly diagnosed cases showed similarity (7.37% vs. 9.79%) before and during the pandemic (p = 0.18). The number of imaging studies decreased by 53.33% in patients under follow-up (p = 0.006), despite screening tests showed a similar trend (p = 0.145). General surgery visits marked up (+44.6%), in contrast to plastic surgery visits (-42.04%, p <0.001). Patients' admissions decreased in many COVID-19 related clinics (pulmonology, emergency, internal medicine, and intensive care), but cardiology (+96.59%) and rehabilitation (+75%) admissions increased during the pandemic (p <0.001). The number of medical oncology and radiation oncology visits did not change (p >0.05). Conclusion: Total number of physician visits was similar before and during the pandemic despite the changing distribution. While COVID-19 led to markedly rising trends of surgical, cardiological, and rehabilitative management in patients with breast cancer, falling trends were seen in other specialities except oncology which showed a plateau during two years. The falling trends of visits to pulmonology, emergency, internal medicine, and intensive care clinics may be explained by crowded COVID-19 cases.
