2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Other Current Induction Therapy Strategies and Anti-T Lymphocyte Globulin Usage in Kidney Transplantation: Consensus-Based Recommendations by a Turkish Expert Panel(Aves, 2024) Çakır, Ülkem; Dinçkan, Ayhan; Karadoğan, Nayim; Keven, Kenan; Koçak, Hüseyin; Koç, Serkan Kubilay; Yıldız, Alaattin; Turkmen, Aydin; Töz, Hüseyin; Sezer, SirenThis advisory committee convened to review national and global kidney transplantation dynamics and provide recom- mendations on the use of anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) for prevention and treatment of rejection after allogeneic kidney transplantation. A critical evaluation of 6 relevant articles released up to October 2022 was performed to reveal their importance in clinical practice. Additionally, 27 key questions on the indication, dosage of ATLG, and risk stratification were used for the Delphi technique with 8 members of the Turkish Society of Nephrology including 5 kidney transplanta- tion (KTx) subcommittee members and a surgeon experienced in solid organ transplantation. The committee declared that Türkiye had great potential in KTx; however, increase in transplantation would be possible in the case of raise in the deceased donor transplantation. As a consensus, ATLG was strongly recommended for induction and rejection treatment. Also, committee members recommended the safe dosage range in steroid resistant acute rejection as 2.5-3 mg/kg daily for 5-7 days, and the median of preferred dosage in induction sounded as 2-2.5 mg/kg daily for 3 days in intermediate risk state. Additionally, post-transplant infection and malignancy cases due to immunosuppression were much rarely encoun- tered than they were in the past.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 2Role of Surveillance Screening in Detecting Tumor Recurrence After Treatment of Childhood Cancers(Aves, 2021) Kısa, Pelin Teke; Emir, Suna; Teke Kısa, PelinObjective: As the survival rates in children with cancer reach up to 80%, this improvement in survival increases the number of patients under follow-up. After cancer treatment is completed, patients are taken to follow-up surveillance to ensure the early detection of recurrence and the late effects of treatments. The frequency and necessity of surveillance screening tests are controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of surveillance screening in the detection of recurrence. Material and methods: The files of 533 children who were diagnosed as having cancer at our pediatric oncology clinic between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. We looked at outcomes after recurrence, the timing and pattern of recurrence, the presence of symptoms during recurrence, physical examination findings, tumor marker levels, laboratory findings, and radiologic tests. Results: Of the 63 patients with recurrence, 23 were symptomatic and 40 were asymptomatic at the time of the recurrence. Tumor location and time of the recurrence did not affect the post recurrence survival. The median post-recurrence survival for patients was 13 (range, 1-98) months. The median post-relapse survival was 10 (range, 1-73) months in patients with symp-tomatic recurrence, and 16 (range, 1-98) months in patients with asymptomatic recurrence. It was determined that patients in whom recurrence was identified with surveillance tests had longer post-relapse survival time. The 5-year survival rate of 23 patients with symptomatic recurrence was 12.2%; this rate was 49.5% in asymptomatic patients (p<0.05).Conclusions: It should be considered that surveillance testing offers the benefit of prolonging post recurrence survival.
