2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Article A Model-Based Evaluation Metric for Question Answering Systems(World Scientific, 2025) Baklr, D.; Aktas, M.S.; Ylldlz, B.The paper addresses the limitations of traditional evaluation metrics for Question Answering (QA) systems that primarily focus on syntax and n-gram similarity. We propose a novel model-based evaluation metric, MQA-metric, and create a human-judgment-based dataset, squad-qametric and marco-qametric, to validate our approach. The research aims to solve several key problems: the objectivity in dataset labeling, the effectiveness of metrics when there is no syntax similarity, the impact of answer length on metric performance, and the influence of real answer quality on metric results. To tackle these challenges, we designed an interface for dataset labeling and conducted extensive experiments with human reviewers. Our analysis shows that the MQA-metric outperforms traditional metrics like BLEU, ROUGE and METEOR. Unlike existing metrics, MQA-metric leverages semantic comprehension through large language models (LLMs), enabling it to capture contextual nuances and synonymous expressions more effectively. This approach sets a standard for evaluating QA systems by prioritizing semantic accuracy over surface-level similarities. The proposed metric correlates better with human judgment, making it a more reliable tool for evaluating QA systems. Our contributions include the development of a robust evaluation workflow, creation of high-quality datasets, and an extensive comparison with existing evaluation methods. The results indicate that our model-based approach provides a significant improvement in assessing the quality of QA systems, which is crucial for their practical application and trustworthiness. © 2025 World Scientific Publishing Company.Conference Object Citation - WoS: 3Citation - Scopus: 5Predicting Software Functional Size Using Natural Language Processing: an Exploratory Case Study(IEEE, 2024) Unlu, Huseyin; Tenekeci, Samet; Ciftci, Can; Oral, Ibrahim Baran; Atalay, Tunahan; Hacaloglu, Tuna; Demirors, OnurSoftware Size Measurement (SSM) plays an essential role in software project management as it enables the acquisition of software size, which is the primary input for development effort and schedule estimation. However, many small and medium-sized companies cannot perform objective SSM and Software Effort Estimation (SEE) due to the lack of resources and an expert workforce. This results in inadequate estimates and projects exceeding the planned time and budget. Therefore, organizations need to perform objective SSM and SEE using minimal resources without an expert workforce. In this research, we conducted an exploratory case study to predict the functional size of software project requirements using state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). For this aim, we fine-tuned BERT and BERT_SE with a set of user stories and their respective functional size in COSMIC Function Points (CFP). We gathered the user stories included in different project requirement documents. In total size prediction, we achieved 72.8% accuracy with BERT and 74.4% accuracy with BERT_SE. In data movement-based size prediction, we achieved 87.5% average accuracy with BERT and 88.1% average accuracy with BERT_SE. Although we use relatively small datasets in model training, these results are promising and hold significant value as they demonstrate the practical utility of language models in SSM.

