3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Article Citation - WoS: 4Citation - Scopus: 5A Note on '(g, f)-closed Set and Tripled Point of Coincidence Theorems for Generalized Compatibility in Partially Metric Spaces'(Springeropen, 2014) Karapinar, Erdal; Roldan-Lopez-de-Hierro, Antonio-FranciscoRecently, some (common) multidimensional fixed theorems in partially ordered complete metric spaces have appeared as a generalization of existing (usual) fixed point results. Unexpectedly, we realized that most of such (common) coupled fixed theorems are either weaker or equivalent to existing fixed point results in the literature. In particular, we prove that the results included in the very recent paper (Charoensawan and Thangthong in Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2014:245, 2014) can be considered as a consequence of existing fixed point theorems on the topic in the literature.Article Citation - WoS: 5Citation - Scopus: 7Irremissible Stimulate on 'unified Fixed Point Theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Via Common Limit Range Property'(Springeropen, 2014) Roldan-Lopez-de-Hierro, Antonio-Francisco; Karapinar, Erdal; Kumam, PoomOne of the goals of this short note is to alert researchers as regards some mistakes that appeared in a recent paper (Chauhan, Khan and Kumar in J. Inequal. Appl. 2013: 182, 2013). This entails main proofs based on a false result, which invalidates all statements. We also give a complete revision of the antecedents of this work in order to find the main reasons of the mistakes. Finally, the main aim of this note is to propose a correct, more general version of the main theorems in the paper mentioned.Article Citation - Scopus: 1Some Remarks About the Existence of Coupled g-coincidence Points(Springeropen, 2015) Erhan, Inci M.; Roldan-Lopez-de-Hierro, Antonio-Francisco; Shahzad, NaseerVery recently, in a series of subsequent papers, Nan and Charoensawan introduced the notion of g-coincidence point of two mappings in different settings (metric spaces and G-metric spaces) and proved some theorems in order to guarantee the existence and uniqueness of such kind of points. Although their notion seems to be attractive, in this paper, we show how this concept can be reduced to the unidimensional notion of coincidence point, and how their main theorems can be seen as particular cases of existing results. Moreover, we prove that the proofs of their main statements have some gaps.
