3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Article Citation - WoS: 47Citation - Scopus: 46Enhanced Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Sizing of Steel Truss Structures With Numerous Discrete Variables(Springer, 2017) Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh; Kazemzadeh Azad, SaeidThe advent of modern computing technologies paved the way for development of numerous efficient structural design optimization tools in the recent decades. In the present study sizing optimization problem of steel truss structures having numerous discrete variables is tackled using combined forms of recently proposed metaheuristic techniques. Three guided, and three guided hybrid metaheuristic algorithms are developed by integrating a design oriented strategy to the stochastic search properties of three recently proposed metaheuristic optimization techniques, namely adaptive dimensional search, modified big bang-big crunch, and exponential big bang-big crunch algorithms. The performances of the proposed guided, and guided hybrid metaheuristic algorithms are compared to those of standard variants through optimum design of real-size steel truss structures with up to 728 design variables according to AISC-LRFD specification. The numerical results reveal that the hybrid form of adaptive dimensional search and exponential big bang-big crunch algorithm is the most promising algorithm amongst the other investigated techniques.Article Citation - WoS: 11Citation - Scopus: 12A Standard Benchmarking Suite for Structural Optimization Algorithms: Iscso 2016-2022(Elsevier Science inc, 2023) Azad, Saeid Kazemzadeh; Azad, Saeıd Kazemzadeh; Azad, Sina Kazemzadeh; Azad, Saeıd Kazemzadeh; Kazemzadeh Azad, Saeid; Department of Civil Engineering; Department of Civil EngineeringBenchmarking is an essential part of developing efficient structural optimization techniques. Despite the advent of numerous metaheuristic techniques for solving truss optimization problems, benchmarking new algorithms is often carried out using a selection of classic test examples which are indeed unchallenging for contemporary sophisticated optimization algorithms. Furthermore, the limited optimization results available in the literature on new test examples are usually not accurately comparable. This is typically due to the lack of infromation about the performance of the investigated algorithms and the inconsistencies between the studies in terms of adopted test examples for benchmarking, optimization problem formulation, maximum number of objective function evaluations and other similar issues. Accordingly, there exists a need for developing new standard test suites composed of easily reproducible challenging test examples with rigorous and comparable performance evaluation results of algorithms on these test suites. To this end, the present work aims to propose a new baseline for benchmarking structural optimization algorithms, using a set of challenging sizing and shape optimization problems of truss structures selected from the international student competition in structural optimization (ISCSO) instances. The most recent six structural optimization examples from the ISCSO are tackled using a representative metaheuristic structural optimization algorithm. The statistical results of all the optimization runs using the proposed benchmarking suite are provided to pave the way for more rigorous benchmarking of structural optimization algorithms.Article Citation - WoS: 25Citation - Scopus: 29Simultaneous Size and Geometry Optimization of Steel Trusses Under Dynamic Excitations(Springer, 2018) Kazemzadeh Azad, Saeid; Bybordiani, Milad; Kazemzadeh Azad, Sina; Jawad, Farqad K. J.During the past decades, the main focus of the research in steel truss optimization has been tailored towards optimal design under static loading conditions and limited work has been devoted to investigating the optimum structural design considering dynamic excitations. This study addresses the simultaneous size and geometry optimization problem of steel truss structures subjected to dynamic excitations. Using the well-known big bang-big crunch algorithm, the minimum-weight design of steel trusses is conducted under both periodic and non-periodic excitations. In the case of periodic excitations, in order to examine the effect of the exciting period of the dynamic load on the final results, the design instances are optimized under different exciting periods and the obtained results are compared. It is observed that by increasing the excitation period of the considered sinusoidal loading as well as the finite rise time of the non-periodic step force, the optimization results approach the minimum design weight obtained under the static loading counterpart. However, in the case of the studied rectangular periodic excitation, the results obtained do not approach the optimum design associated with the static loading case even for higher values of the exciting period.
