2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Article Citation - WoS: 39Citation - Scopus: 49Individual Flipped Learning and Cooperative Flipped Learning: Their Effects on Students' Performance, Social, and Computer Anxiety(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2019) Eryilmaz, Meltem; Cigdemoglu, CeyhanThe purpose of this study is to differentiate the effect of cooperative learning strategy integrated with a flipped learning (FL) model from sole FL implementation in promoting students' performances while decreasing their social and computer anxiety in an undergraduate course. As a method, a classical experimental design is used. The participants were from the department of English Language and Literature, and Translation and Interpretation. Students were randomly assigned to individual FL (the control group) class; and FL with cooperative activities (experimental group) class. The groups were randomly assigned as experimental and control by tossing a coin. The implementation took 10 weeks. Students' performances (grades), social anxiety, and computer anxiety were dependent variables of the study and they were compared through multivariate analysis of variance. The results indicated that there is no significant mean difference between groups' performances; however; the group of FL with cooperative activities had less social anxiety, but no significant change occurred at their computer anxiety level.Article Citation - WoS: 108Citation - Scopus: 186A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test To Assess Pre-Service Teachers' Misconceptions About Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain(Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2012) Arslan, Harika Ozge; Cigdemoglu, Ceyhan; Moseley, ChristineThis study describes the development and validation of a three-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test, the atmosphere-related environmental problems diagnostic test (AREPDiT), to reveal common misconceptions of global warming (GW), greenhouse effect (GE), ozone layer depletion (OLD), and acid rain (AR). The development of a two-tier diagnostic test procedure as described by Treagust constitutes the framework for this study. To differentiate a lack of knowledge from a misconception, a certainty response index is added as a third tier to each item. Based on propositional knowledge statements, related literature, and the identified misconceptions gathered initially from 157 pre-service teachers, the AREPDiT was constructed and administered to 256 pre-service teachers. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the pre-service teachers' scores was estimated to be 0.74. Content and face validations were established by senior experts. A moderate positive correlation between the participants' both-tiers scores and their certainty scores indicated evidence for construct validity. Therefore, the AREPDiT is a reliable and valid instrument not only to identify pre-service teachers' misconceptions about GW, GE, OLD, and AR but also to differentiate these misconceptions from lack of knowledge. The results also reveal that a majority of the respondents demonstrated limited understandings about atmosphere-related environmental problems and held six common misconceptions. Future studies could test the AREPDiT as a tool for assessing the misconceptions held by pre-service teachers from different programs as well as in-service teachers and high school students.
