2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Article Citation - WoS: 5Citation - Scopus: 9Deviations of Body Functions and Structure, Activity Limitations, and Participation Restrictions of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Model in Children With Cystic Fibrosis and Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis(Wiley, 2020) Ozipek, Melike; Arikan, Hulya; Calik-Kutukcu, Ebru; Kerem-Gunel, Mintaze; Saglam, Melda; Inal-Ince, Deniz; Ozcelik, UgurBackground To the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature investigating the extrapulmonary outcomes of children with non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis and CF under the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) model. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the children with CF and non-CF bronchiectasis using the ICF model. Materials and Methods Children with CF, non-CF bronchiectasis, and healthy counterparts were evaluated (20 participants in each group) according to the ICF items in domain b (body functions), domain s (body structures), and domain d (activities and participation). The pulmonary functions, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength tests, and posture analysis were carried out for domain b. For domain d, however, the Glittre-activities of daily living test and Pediatric Outcome Data Collection were used. Results Muscle strength of shoulder abductors and hip extensors in children with CF was significantly lower than healthy children and adolescents (P < .05). The severity of lateral and posterior postural abnormalities in children with CF and non-CF bronchiectasis was higher than those of healthy children (P < .05). Among the patient groups, global function, sports/physical function, expectations, transfers/basic mobility, and pain/comfort were the most affected participation dimensions (P < .05). Conclusions This study highlights the need for comprehensive up-to-date evaluation methods according to the ICF model for understanding rehabilitation requirements in CF and non-CF bronchiectasis in different age groups.Article Citation - WoS: 24Citation - Scopus: 29The Effectiveness of Oropharyngeal Exercises Compared To Inspiratory Muscle Training in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Randomized Controlled Trial(Mosby-elsevier, 2020) Erturk, Nurel; Calik-Kutukcu, Ebru; Arikan, Hulya; Savci, Sema; Inal-Ince, Deniz; Caliskan, Hakan; Ardic, SadikBackground: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and oropharyngeal exercises (OE) have different advantages and disadvantages and a comparison of these modalities has been recommended. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of IMT and OE on important outcomes for patients with OSAS. Methods: This was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty-one clinically stable OSAS patients not receiving CPAP therapy were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in the IMT group (n = 15) trained with a threshold loading device 7 days/week for 12 weeks. Patients in the OE group (n = 14) practiced exercises 5 days/week for 12 weeks. Twelve patients served as control group. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory muscle strength, snoring severity and frequency (Berlin Questionnaire), daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; ESS), sleep quality (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index; PSQI), impact of sleepiness on daily life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire; FOSQ), and fatigue severity (Fatigue Severity Scale; FSS) were evaluated before and after the interventions. Results: AHI and sleep efficiency did not change significantly in any of the groups. Significant decreases in snoring severity and frequency, FSS and PSQI total scores were found in the IMT and OE groups after the treatments (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in neck and waist circumference and significant improvement in respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP) in IMT group compared to control group (p < 0.05). The%MEPpred value and FOSQ total score significantly increased and ESS score reduced after the treatment in OE group compared to control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results indicate that both OE and IMT rehabilitation interventions are applicable in rehabilitation programs for OSAS patients who do not accept CPAP therapy. Our findings could lead to increase these methods' use among rehabilitation professionals and decrease in cost of CPAP treatment in OSAS. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

