Comparison of the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Versus Vaginal Progesterone Using a Rescue Protocol in Vitrified Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

dc.authorid Esteves, Sandro/0000-0002-1313-9680
dc.authorid Mumusoglu, Sezcan/0000-0001-7000-7580
dc.authorid Humaidan, Peter/0000-0001-6884-5366
dc.authorscopusid 7003789654
dc.authorscopusid 37002884700
dc.authorscopusid 24482383000
dc.authorscopusid 57212891075
dc.authorscopusid 57195769991
dc.authorscopusid 57208580149
dc.authorscopusid 57208580149
dc.authorwosid Esteves, Sandro/G-4416-2012
dc.authorwosid Humaidan, Peter/KMX-8289-2024
dc.contributor.author Yarali, Hakan
dc.contributor.author Mumusoglu, Sezcan
dc.contributor.author Polat, Mehtap
dc.contributor.author Erden, Murat
dc.contributor.author Ozbek, Irem Yarali
dc.contributor.author Esteves, Sandro C.
dc.contributor.author Humaidan, Peter
dc.contributor.other First and Emergency Aid Program
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:21:46Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:21:46Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Yarali, Hakan; Mumusoglu, Sezcan; Erden, Murat] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Yarali, Hakan; Polat, Mehtap; Ozbek, Irem Yarali] Anatolia IVF & Women Hlth Ctr, Ankara, Turkiye; [Polat, Mehtap] Atilim Univ, Dept Med Serv & Tech, First & Emergency Aid Program, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Ankara, Turkiye; [Esteves, Sandro C.] Referral Ctr Male Reprod, Androfert Androl & Human Reprod Clin, Campinas, SP, Brazil; [Esteves, Sandro C.; Humaidan, Peter] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark; [Humaidan, Peter] Skive Reg Hosp, Fertil Clin, Skive, Denmark en_US
dc.description Esteves, Sandro/0000-0002-1313-9680; Mumusoglu, Sezcan/0000-0001-7000-7580; Humaidan, Peter/0000-0001-6884-5366 en_US
dc.description.abstract Research question: Does administration of subcutaneous (s.c.) progesterone support ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) similar to vaginal progesterone using a rescue protocol in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles?Design: Retrospective cohort study. Two sequential cohorts -vaginal progesterone gel (December 2019-October 2021; n=474) and s.c. progesterone (November 2021-November 2022; n=249)-were compared. Following oestrogen priming, s.c. progesterone 25 mg twice daily (b.d.) or vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg b.d. was administered. Serum progesterone was measured 1 day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer (i.e. day 5 of progesterone administration). In patients with serum progesterone concentrations <8.75 ng/ml, additional s.c. progesterone (rescue protocol; 25 mg) was provided.Results: In the vaginal progesterone gel group, 15.8% of patients had serum progesterone <8.75 ng/ml and received the rescue protocol, whereas no patients in the s.c. progesterone group received the rescue protocol. OPR, along with positive pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates, were comparable between the s.c. progesterone group without the rescue protocol and the vaginal progesterone gel group with the rescue protocol. After the rescue protocol, the route of progesterone administration was not a significant predictor of ongoing pregnancy. The impact of different serum progesterone concentrations on reproductive outcomes was evaluated by percentile (<10(th), 10-49(th), 50-90(th) and >90(th) percentiles), taking the >90(th) percentile as the reference subgroup. In both the vaginal progesterone gel group and the s.c. progesterone group, all serum progesterone percentile subgroups had similar OPR.Conclusions: Subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg b.d. secures serum progesterone >8.75 ng/ml, whereas additional exogenous progesterone (rescue protocol) was needed in 15.8% of patients who received vaginal progesterone. The s.c. and vaginal progesterone routes, with the rescue protocol if needed, yield comparable OPR. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 1
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.005
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6483
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6491
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 37400318
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85164369386
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.005
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2129
dc.identifier.volume 47 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001074115300001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.institutionauthor Polat, Mehtap
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 4
dc.subject Hormone replacement therapy en_US
dc.subject Frozen embryo transfer en_US
dc.subject Subcutaneous progesterone en_US
dc.subject Luteal phase support en_US
dc.subject Serum progesterone en_US
dc.subject Ongoing pregnancy en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Versus Vaginal Progesterone Using a Rescue Protocol in Vitrified Blastocyst Transfer Cycles en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 4
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 545441d4-a12c-4fce-aad3-a7f220524e32
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 545441d4-a12c-4fce-aad3-a7f220524e32
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication f84c8071-a11d-4d7c-aea0-e350472914ca
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery f84c8071-a11d-4d7c-aea0-e350472914ca

Files

Collections