Comparison of the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Versus Vaginal Progesterone Using a Rescue Protocol in Vitrified Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Research question: Does administration of subcutaneous (s.c.) progesterone support ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) similar to vaginal progesterone using a rescue protocol in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles?Design: Retrospective cohort study. Two sequential cohorts -vaginal progesterone gel (December 2019-October 2021; n=474) and s.c. progesterone (November 2021-November 2022; n=249)-were compared. Following oestrogen priming, s.c. progesterone 25 mg twice daily (b.d.) or vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg b.d. was administered. Serum progesterone was measured 1 day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer (i.e. day 5 of progesterone administration). In patients with serum progesterone concentrations <8.75 ng/ml, additional s.c. progesterone (rescue protocol; 25 mg) was provided.Results: In the vaginal progesterone gel group, 15.8% of patients had serum progesterone <8.75 ng/ml and received the rescue protocol, whereas no patients in the s.c. progesterone group received the rescue protocol. OPR, along with positive pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates, were comparable between the s.c. progesterone group without the rescue protocol and the vaginal progesterone gel group with the rescue protocol. After the rescue protocol, the route of progesterone administration was not a significant predictor of ongoing pregnancy. The impact of different serum progesterone concentrations on reproductive outcomes was evaluated by percentile (<10(th), 10-49(th), 50-90(th) and >90(th) percentiles), taking the >90(th) percentile as the reference subgroup. In both the vaginal progesterone gel group and the s.c. progesterone group, all serum progesterone percentile subgroups had similar OPR.Conclusions: Subcutaneous progesterone 25 mg b.d. secures serum progesterone >8.75 ng/ml, whereas additional exogenous progesterone (rescue protocol) was needed in 15.8% of patients who received vaginal progesterone. The s.c. and vaginal progesterone routes, with the rescue protocol if needed, yield comparable OPR.

Description

Esteves, Sandro/0000-0002-1313-9680; Mumusoglu, Sezcan/0000-0001-7000-7580; Humaidan, Peter/0000-0001-6884-5366

Keywords

Hormone replacement therapy, Frozen embryo transfer, Subcutaneous progesterone, Luteal phase support, Serum progesterone, Ongoing pregnancy, Frozen embryo transfer, Pregnancy Rate, Subcutaneous progesterone, Luteal phase support, Estrogens, Embryo Transfer, Hormone replacement therapy, Pregnancy, Ongoing pregnancy, Humans, Female, Serum progesterone, Progesterone, Retrospective Studies

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q2
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
5

Source

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volume

47

Issue

3

Start Page

103233

End Page

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 5

Scopus : 5

PubMed : 4

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 4

SCOPUS™ Citations

5

checked on Mar 06, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

5

checked on Mar 06, 2026

Page Views

1

checked on Mar 06, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.771

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available