Role of surveillance screening in detecting tumor recurrence after treatment of childhood cancers

dc.authorscopusid57204463342
dc.authorscopusid55894179800
dc.authorwosidKısa, Pelin Teke/AAM-8337-2021
dc.authorwosidKISA, Pelin/ABE-9852-2021
dc.contributor.authorKısa, Pelin Teke
dc.contributor.authorEmir, Suna
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:18:46Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:18:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-tempSAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ,ATILIM ÜNİVERSİTESİen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: As the survival rates in children with cancer reach up to 80%, this improvement in survival increases the number of patients under follow-up. After cancer treatment is completed, patients are taken to follow-up surveillance to ensure the early detection of recurrence and the late effects of treatments. The frequency and necessity of surveillance screening tests are controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of surveillance screening in the detection of recurrence. Material and methods: The files of 533 children who were diagnosed as having cancer at our pediatric oncology clinic between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. We looked at outcomes after recurrence, the timing and pattern of recurrence, the presence of symptoms during recurrence, physical examination findings, tumor marker levels, laboratory findings, and radiologic tests. Results: Of the 63 patients with recurrence, 23 were symptomatic and 40 were asymptomatic at the time of the recurrence. Tumor location and time of the recurrence did not affect the post recurrence survival. The median post-recurrence survival for patients was 13 (range, 1-98) months. The median post-relapse survival was 10 (range, 1-73) months in patients with symp-tomatic recurrence, and 16 (range, 1-98) months in patients with asymptomatic recurrence. It was determined that patients in whom recurrence was identified with surveillance tests had longer post-relapse survival time. The 5-year survival rate of 23 patients with symptomatic recurrence was 12.2%; this rate was 49.5% in asymptomatic patients (p<0.05).Conclusions: It should be considered that surveillance testing offers the benefit of prolonging post recurrence survival.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/TurkPediatriArs.2020.38243
dc.identifier.endpage151en_US
dc.identifier.issn2757-6256
dc.identifier.issn2757-6256
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34286325
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85114120788
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage147en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid445508
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/TurkPediatriArs.2020.38243
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/445508/role-of-surveillance-screening-in-detecting-tumor-recurrence-after-treatment-of-childhood-cancers
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000624295100010
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.institutionauthorEmir, Suna
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish archives of pediatrics (Online)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleRole of surveillance screening in detecting tumor recurrence after treatment of childhood cancersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication79b126cb-7669-41d7-8dd2-ea7cf663eea9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery79b126cb-7669-41d7-8dd2-ea7cf663eea9

Files