Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part One: Superior Repositioning Surgery

dc.authorid ERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authorid Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830
dc.authorscopusid 24171196000
dc.authorscopusid 8250449600
dc.authorscopusid 8520541100
dc.authorwosid Kılınç, Yeliz/AAP-6529-2021
dc.authorwosid Erkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.author Kilinc, Yeliz
dc.contributor.author Erkmen, Erkan
dc.contributor.author Kurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T14:33:04Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T14:33:04Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Kilinc, Yeliz; Erkmen, Erkan] Gazi Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Biskek Cd 8 Cd 82 Sk 4, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Fac Engn, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description ERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281; Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830 en_US
dc.description.abstract The aim of the current study was to comparatively evaluate the mechanical behavior of 3 different fixation methods following various amounts of superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segment. In this study, 3 different rigid fixation configurations comprising double right L, double left L, or double I miniplates with monocortical screws were compared under vertical, horizontal, and oblique load conditions by means of finite element analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model of a fully dentate mandible was generated. A 3 and 5mm superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy were simulated. Three different finite element models corresponding to different fixation configurations were created for each superior repositioning. The von Mises stress values on fixation appliances and principal maximum stresses (P-max) on bony structures were predicted by finite element analysis. The results have demonstrated that double right L configuration provides better stability with less stress fields in comparison with other fixation configurations used in this study. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Gazi University Scientific Research Foundation [03/2010-17] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by a Grant from the Gazi University Scientific Research Foundation (03/2010-17). en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 8
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002172
dc.identifier.endpage 35 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn 1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue 1 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 26703028
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84957047356
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 32 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002172
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/873
dc.identifier.volume 27 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000370075700006
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 7
dc.subject Biomechanics en_US
dc.subject finite element analysis en_US
dc.subject jaw fixation techniques en_US
dc.subject mandible en_US
dc.subject mandibular osteotomy en_US
dc.title Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part One: Superior Repositioning Surgery en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 8
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files

Collections