Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part One: Superior Repositioning Surgery

dc.authoridERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authoridKilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830
dc.authorscopusid24171196000
dc.authorscopusid8250449600
dc.authorscopusid8520541100
dc.authorwosidKılınç, Yeliz/AAP-6529-2021
dc.authorwosidErkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T14:33:04Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T14:33:04Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kilinc, Yeliz; Erkmen, Erkan] Gazi Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Biskek Cd 8 Cd 82 Sk 4, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Fac Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281; Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the current study was to comparatively evaluate the mechanical behavior of 3 different fixation methods following various amounts of superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segment. In this study, 3 different rigid fixation configurations comprising double right L, double left L, or double I miniplates with monocortical screws were compared under vertical, horizontal, and oblique load conditions by means of finite element analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model of a fully dentate mandible was generated. A 3 and 5mm superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy were simulated. Three different finite element models corresponding to different fixation configurations were created for each superior repositioning. The von Mises stress values on fixation appliances and principal maximum stresses (P-max) on bony structures were predicted by finite element analysis. The results have demonstrated that double right L configuration provides better stability with less stress fields in comparison with other fixation configurations used in this study.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGazi University Scientific Research Foundation [03/2010-17]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a Grant from the Gazi University Scientific Research Foundation (03/2010-17).en_US
dc.identifier.citation8
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002172
dc.identifier.endpage35en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26703028
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84957047356
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage32en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002172
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/873
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000370075700006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectjaw fixation techniquesen_US
dc.subjectmandibleen_US
dc.subjectmandibular osteotomyen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part One: Superior Repositioning Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections