Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part One: Superior Repositioning Surgery

Loading...

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Average

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to comparatively evaluate the mechanical behavior of 3 different fixation methods following various amounts of superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segment. In this study, 3 different rigid fixation configurations comprising double right L, double left L, or double I miniplates with monocortical screws were compared under vertical, horizontal, and oblique load conditions by means of finite element analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model of a fully dentate mandible was generated. A 3 and 5mm superior repositioning of mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy were simulated. Three different finite element models corresponding to different fixation configurations were created for each superior repositioning. The von Mises stress values on fixation appliances and principal maximum stresses (P-max) on bony structures were predicted by finite element analysis. The results have demonstrated that double right L configuration provides better stability with less stress fields in comparison with other fixation configurations used in this study.

Description

ERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281; Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830

Keywords

Biomechanics, finite element analysis, jaw fixation techniques, mandible, mandibular osteotomy, Orthognathic Surgical Procedures, Bone Screws, Finite Element Analysis, Mandibular Osteotomy, Mandible, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Models, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bite Force, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Humans, Computer Simulation, Stress, Mechanical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Bone Plates

Fields of Science

03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
9

Volume

27

Issue

1

Start Page

32

End Page

35

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 6

Scopus : 9

PubMed : 3

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 22

SCOPUS™ Citations

9

checked on May 24, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

10

checked on May 24, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.86

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available