Randomised Comparison Between Navigation and Non-Navigation Camera Control Performance in a Surgical Simulation Task Using a Haptic Device Interface
Loading...

Date
2026
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Introduction:Navigation skills for controlling the camera in the surgical field are critical for many minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures. Currently, endoscopes lack integrated navigation aids, making camera control a challenging task. This experimental study aims to investigate the effect of navigation guidance on the performance of beginners.Patients and Methods:A custom computer-based simulation environment was developed for this study, featuring two conditions - one with navigation guidance and one without - focussed on a camera-cleaning task. Participants (64 beginners) were randomly assigned to one of these groups and used two haptic devices to simulate the endoscope and surgical tools.Results:Participants in the guided condition performed significantly better than those in the unguided condition. Notably, female participants completed the task in significantly less time under the guided condition compared to the unguided one.Conclusion:These findings suggest that incorporating navigation aids into endoscope interfaces could improve user performance, especially for beginners. Medical device manufacturers should consider adding navigation features to enhance usability. In addition, simulation-based instructional systems should integrate navigation aids to better support surgical training.
Description
Keywords
Beginner, Camera Positioning, Haptic Devices, Minimal Invasive Surgery, Virtual Reality Training
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Volume
22
Issue
1
Start Page
38
End Page
44
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


