Understanding the Effect of Handedness on Both-Handed Task Performance: an Experimental Study Based on a Haptic-Controlled, Simulation-Based Surgical Skill Training Scenario
Loading...

Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis inc
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Understanding the performance on both-handed tasks, such as endoscopic surgery, is critical to better organize and develop appropriate instructional systems to improve the necessary skills of surgeons. However, in the literature, only a limited number of studies have investigated the effect of handedness on both-handed task performance. This study aimed to provide an understanding of the participants' performance differences while performing both-handed tasks through a haptic user interface in a simulated virtual environment specifically developed for surgical training purposes. Twenty-four surgeons attending a medical school in Turkey voluntarily participated in the study. The duration, accuracy, and collision measures were automatically recorded by software. The results revealed that the left-handed participants performed the both-handed tasks (camera: nondominant hand, tool: dominant-hand) in a significantly shorter time than the right-handed participants. This study also showed that haptic-controlled simulation-based surgical skill training systems can potentially provide measures for better understanding the individual behaviors and deliver alternative training environments specific to individual requirements.
Description
Cagiltay, Nergiz/0000-0003-0875-9276
ORCID
Keywords
[No Keyword Available]
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
4
Source
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Volume
35
Issue
6
Start Page
478
End Page
482
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 32
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Apr 21, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Apr 21, 2026
Page Views
1
checked on Apr 21, 2026
Google Scholar™


