How do implant threads and diameters affect the all-on-four success? A 3D finite element analysis study

dc.contributor.authorZor, Zeynep Fatma
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:16:48Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:16:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Zor, Zeynep Fatma; Kilinc, Yeliz; Erkmen, Erkan] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet] Atilim Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The effect of different thread designs and diameters on the all-on-four concept is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to clarify the differences in stress distribution of dental implants with various thread designs and diameters based on the all-on-four concept with three dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: A 3D model of a totally edentulous mandible was used to perform the FEA. Four different models (M1, M2, M3, and M4) including 3.5 and 4.3 mm diameter dental implants with active and passive threaded designs were generated. The dental implants were positioned according to the all-on-four concept. The Von Mises stresses on dental implants and maximum and minimum principal stresses (Pmax and Pmin) on bony structures were calculated under vertical, oblique and horizontal loads. RESULTS: For Von Mises stresses, the highest stress values were detected on the distal implants for all models. Distal implants had also the highest stress values for vertical loading. The Von Mises stresses were found to be concentrated around the implant's neck. In all models the highest Pmax and Pmin stresses occurred in the bone surrounding the distal implant. It was noted that the active threaded implants showed the highest Pmax and Pmin stress values. CONCLUSION: The implant thread design and diameter might have a strong influence on the stress values in the all-on-four concept.en_US
dc.identifier.citation2
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/THC-213072
dc.identifier.endpage1042en_US
dc.identifier.issn0928-7329
dc.identifier.issn1878-7401
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35570504
dc.identifier.startpage1031en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/THC-213072
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1666
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000856620900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIos Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartof24th International Scientific Congress of the Turkish-Association-of-Oral-and-Maxillofacial-Surgery -- MAY 23-27, 2017 -- Mugla, TURKEYen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAll-on-fouren_US
dc.subjectdental implanten_US
dc.subjectdiameteren_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectthread designen_US
dc.titleHow do implant threads and diameters affect the all-on-four success? A 3D finite element analysis studyen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections