Comparison Between Alternating Aerobic-Anoxic and Conventional Activated Sludge Systems
| dc.contributor.author | Balku, Saziye | |
| dc.contributor.other | Energy Systems Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.other | 06. School Of Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.other | 01. Atılım University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-05T14:33:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-05T14:33:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Conventional activated sludge systems ensure removal of colloidal and dissolved carbonaceous organic matter whereas alternating aerobic-anoxic systems, in addition, satisfy a further reduction in nitrogen content of wastewater. Main difference between them is that the alternating system should also include an anoxic operation mode which satisfies denitrification. In other words conventional systems are operated under aerobic conditions whereas alternating systems require a periodical change from aerobic conditions to anoxic conditions. So the most important problem in alternating systems is to find the appropriate durations for both sequences. In this study a comparison between conventional and alternating systems is considered in terms of nitrogen removal and aeration time by simulation under the same conditions together with an optimization algorithm. The results show that an activated sludge system can be operated as an alternating aerobic-anoxic system so that nitrogen removal is also possible during treatment without any additional investment or operational cost. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.046 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0043-1354 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-34247098938 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.046 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/953 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Water Research | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | alternating aerobic-anoxic | en_US |
| dc.subject | activated sludge | en_US |
| dc.subject | ASM3 | en_US |
| dc.subject | optimization | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison Between Alternating Aerobic-Anoxic and Conventional Activated Sludge Systems | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.institutional | Balku, Şaziye | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 11139496600 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.access | metadata only access | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.description.department | Atılım University | en_US |
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | Atilim Univ, Ind Liaison Off, TR-06370 Ankara, Turkey | en_US |
| gdc.description.endpage | 2228 | en_US |
| gdc.description.issue | 10 | en_US |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| gdc.description.startpage | 2220 | en_US |
| gdc.description.volume | 41 | en_US |
| gdc.description.wosquality | Q1 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2066224596 | |
| gdc.identifier.pmid | 17355887 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000246732500018 | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 6.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 7.079509E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Sewage | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Equipment Design | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Composite Resins | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Waste Disposal, Fluid | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Aerobiosis | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Phosphates | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Kinetics | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Metals | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.2703233E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0211 other engineering and technologies | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 01 natural sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0105 earth and related environmental sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.442 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.84 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 26 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 12 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 42 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 35 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 35 | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 31 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | e37b4a4b-c7b7-437f-928d-c0e346c18c8e | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | e37b4a4b-c7b7-437f-928d-c0e346c18c8e | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 80f84cab-4b75-401b-b4b1-f2ec308f3067 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 4abda634-67fd-417f-bee6-59c29fc99997 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 80f84cab-4b75-401b-b4b1-f2ec308f3067 |