Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort 1 osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA Part 2: Impaction surgery

dc.authoridERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authorscopusid24401051800
dc.authorscopusid8250449600
dc.authorscopusid57196871123
dc.authorscopusid8520541100
dc.authorwosidErkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.authorAtac, M. S.
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, E.
dc.contributor.authorYucel, E.
dc.contributor.authorKurt, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T14:33:50Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T14:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Atac, M. S.; Erkmen, E.; Yucel, E.] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-06510 Emek, Turkey; [Kurt, A.] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the second part of this Study was to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of 2- versus 4-plate fixation and bony structures after Le Fort I impaction surgeries using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Two 3D-FEA models were created to fixate the impacted maxilla at the Le Fort I level as 2-plate fixation at the piriform rims (IMP-2 model) and 4-plate fixation at the zygomatic buttresses and piriform rims (IMP-4 model). The IMP-2 model contained 225 664 elements and 48 754 nodes and the IMP-4 model consisted of 245 929 elements and 53 670 nodes. The stresses in each maxillary model were computed. The models were loaded on one side, at the molar-premolar region, in vertical, horizontal and oblique directions to reflect the chewing process. It was concluded that the use of 4-plate fixation following Le Fort I advancement Surgery provides fewer stress fields on the maxillary bones and fixation materials than 2-plate fixation from a mechanical point of view.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGazi University Scientific Research Foundation [03/2004-19]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from the Gazi University Scientific Research Foundation (03/2004-19).en_US
dc.identifier.citation18
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.005
dc.identifier.endpage63en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19046854
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-58149468407
dc.identifier.startpage58en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/970
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000262990800009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject3D finite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectLe Fort 1 osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectImpaction surgeryen_US
dc.subjectInternal fixationen_US
dc.titleComparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort 1 osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA Part 2: Impaction surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections