An Empirical Evaluation of Software Quality Assurance Practices and Challenges in a Developing Country: a Comparison of Nigeria and Turkey

dc.contributor.author Sowunmi, Olaperi Yeside
dc.contributor.author Mısra, Sanjay
dc.contributor.author Misra, Sanjay
dc.contributor.author Fernandez-Sanz, Luis
dc.contributor.author Crawford, Broderick
dc.contributor.author Soto, Ricardo
dc.contributor.author Mısra, Sanjay
dc.contributor.other Computer Engineering
dc.contributor.other Computer Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T14:31:24Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T14:31:24Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.description Fernandez-Sanz, Luis/0000-0003-0778-0073; Misra, Sanjay/0000-0002-3556-9331; Okuboyejo, Olaperi/0000-0002-0937-2607 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The importance of quality assurance in the software development process cannot be overemphasized because its adoption results in high reliability and easy maintenance of the software system and other software products. Software quality assurance includes different activities such as quality control, quality management, quality standards, quality planning, process standardization and improvement amongst others. The aim of this work is to further investigate the software quality assurance practices of practitioners in Nigeria. While our previous work covered areas on quality planning, adherence to standardized processes and the inherent challenges, this work has been extended to include quality control, software process improvement and international quality standard organization membership. It also makes comparison based on a similar study carried out in Turkey. The goal is to generate more robust findings that can properly support decision making by the software community. The qualitative research approach, specifically, the use of questionnaire research instruments was applied to acquire data from software practitioners. Results: In addition to the previous results, it was observed that quality assurance practices are quite neglected and this can be the cause of low patronage. Moreover, software practitioners are neither aware of international standards organizations or the required process improvement techniques; as such their claimed standards are not aligned to those of accredited bodies, and are only limited to their local experience and knowledge, which makes it questionable. The comparison with Turkey also yielded similar findings, making the results typical of developing countries. The research instrument used was tested for internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha, and it was proved reliable. Conclusion: For the software industry in developing countries to grow strong and be a viable source of external revenue, software assurance practices have to be taken seriously because its effect is evident in the final product. Moreover, quality frameworks and tools which require minimum time and cost are highly needed in these countries. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s40064-016-3575-5
dc.identifier.issn 2193-1801
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85011838824
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3575-5
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/673
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer international Publishing Ag en_US
dc.relation.ispartof SpringerPlus
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Software en_US
dc.subject Software quality en_US
dc.subject Software quality challenges en_US
dc.subject Software quality assurance en_US
dc.title An Empirical Evaluation of Software Quality Assurance Practices and Challenges in a Developing Country: a Comparison of Nigeria and Turkey en_US
dc.type Review en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Fernandez-Sanz, Luis/0000-0003-0778-0073
gdc.author.id Misra, Sanjay/0000-0002-3556-9331
gdc.author.id Okuboyejo, Olaperi/0000-0002-0937-2607
gdc.author.scopusid 57188921224
gdc.author.scopusid 56962766700
gdc.author.scopusid 25630384100
gdc.author.scopusid 23395875300
gdc.author.scopusid 24403038600
gdc.author.wosid Fernandez, Luis/KHX-5442-2024
gdc.author.wosid Fernandez-Sanz, Luis/J-4895-2012
gdc.author.wosid Misra, Sanjay/K-2203-2014
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::review
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Sowunmi, Olaperi Yeside; Misra, Sanjay] Covenant Univ, Ota, Nigeria; [Misra, Sanjay] Atilim Univ, Ankara, Turkey; [Fernandez-Sanz, Luis] Univ Alcala De Henares, Madrid, Spain; [Crawford, Broderick; Soto, Ricardo] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Diğer en_US
gdc.description.volume 5 en_US
gdc.identifier.openalex W2548623095
gdc.identifier.pmid 27867827
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000391383000001
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 4.561832E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Review
gdc.oaire.popularity 7.618017E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.9838116
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.95
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 8
gdc.plumx.facebookshareslikecount 49
gdc.plumx.mendeley 121
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 9
gdc.scopus.citedcount 9
gdc.virtual.author Mısra, Sanjay
gdc.wos.citedcount 3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 53e88841-fdb7-484f-9e08-efa4e6d1a090
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 53e88841-fdb7-484f-9e08-efa4e6d1a090
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 53e88841-fdb7-484f-9e08-efa4e6d1a090
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 53e88841-fdb7-484f-9e08-efa4e6d1a090
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication e0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4abda634-67fd-417f-bee6-59c29fc99997
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery e0809e2c-77a7-4f04-9cb0-4bccec9395fa

Files

Collections