Time Complexity Comparison of Stopping at First Failure and Completely Running the Test
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Abstract
For a given test set, we compare two test application techniques, "stopping at first failure" and "complete run", respectively. The former stops the test whenever a failure is encountered. The latter however, carries on till the end. Our comparison concludes that although the first technique is generally faster, there is no strong evidence to support a complete rejection of the second technique for it provides statistics useful in test planning. Results support an interchangeable application of both techniques with more frequent use of stopping at first failure. Even though there are numerous studies to decide how to prioritize and select test cases (TC), or to examine dependencies of TCs and codes, the presented comparison of the two test application techniques for a given "test set" has the potential to reduce the total run time of the test.
Description
Yucesan, Ongun/0000-0003-2263-6803
ORCID
Keywords
High-volume testing, VLSI test application, Test application time, Stopping on first failure, Running all tests, Test planning
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
0
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Source
Volume
36
Issue
3
Start Page
409
End Page
417