Protection or Redundancy: Which is Better and When in Terms of Mean Time to Failure and Cost

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2026

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This article is about comparing the effectiveness of protection mechanism and redundancy methods in terms of mean time to failure and cost criteria. Under the protection mechanism, a component is assumed to have different failure rates when it is protected and nonprotected. The protection block is also subject to failure and has constant failure rate. Alternatively, a redundant component which has the same failure rate with the original component may be used to enhance the reliability. For single unit and series systems, necessary conditions on the failure rate of the component are obtained to have a relation between the mean time to failure values of the system under both protection and redundancy. The extension of the results to coherent systems is also discussed.

Description

Keywords

Coherent System, Mean Time to Failure, Protection Block, Redundancy

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q1

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Volume

265

Issue

Start Page

111544

End Page

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 4

SCOPUS™ Citations

4

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

3

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Page Views

32

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Downloads

78

checked on Feb 14, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
15.30590008

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available