Techniques for Calculating Software Product Metrics Threshold Values: a Systematic Mapping Study
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Mdpi
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Several aspects of software product quality can be assessed and measured using product metrics. Without software metric threshold values, it is difficult to evaluate different aspects of quality. To this end, the interest in research studies that focus on identifying and deriving threshold values is growing, given the advantage of applying software metric threshold values to evaluate various software projects during their software development life cycle phases. The aim of this paper is to systematically investigate research on software metric threshold calculation techniques. In this study, electronic databases were systematically searched for relevant papers; 45 publications were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, and research questions were answered. The results demonstrate the following important characteristics of studies: (a) both empirical and theoretical studies were conducted, a majority of which depends on empirical analysis; (b) the majority of papers apply statistical techniques to derive object-oriented metrics threshold values; (c) Chidamber and Kemerer (CK) metrics were studied in most of the papers, and are widely used to assess the quality of software systems; and (d) there is a considerable number of studies that have not validated metric threshold values in terms of quality attributes. From both the academic and practitioner points of view, the results of this review present a catalog and body of knowledge on metric threshold calculation techniques. The results set new research directions, such as conducting mixed studies on statistical and quality-related studies, studying an extensive number of metrics and studying interactions among metrics, studying more quality attributes, and considering multivariate threshold derivation.
Description
Mishra, Alok/0000-0003-1275-2050; Catal, Cagatay/0000-0003-0959-2930; Shatnawi, Raed/0000-0001-7777-1370
Keywords
object-oriented metrics, software metrics, object-oriented measures, thresholds, systematic mapping, software quality, Technology, QH301-705.5, QC1-999, Software quality, systematic mapping, software metrics, Object-oriented metrics, Software Metrics, Biology (General), QD1-999, Object-oriented Metrics, object-oriented metrics, Object-oriented measures, T, Physics, thresholds, 005, Systematic Mapping, software quality, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Object-oriented Measures, Software Quality, object-oriented metrics; software metrics; object-oriented measures; thresholds; systematic mapping; software quality, Chemistry, Systematic mapping, Object-oriented measures; Object-oriented metrics; Software metrics; Software quality; Systematic mapping; Thresholds, object-oriented measures, Thresholds, TA1-2040, Software metrics
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
8
Source
Applied Sciences
Volume
11
Issue
23
Start Page
11377
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 11
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 24
SCOPUS™ Citations
13
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
12
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Page Views
1
checked on Feb 01, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
2.91130136
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

6
CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

14
LIFE BELOW WATER


