Integrating Personalized Thermal Comfort Devices for Energy-Efficient and Occupant-Centric Buildings
Loading...
Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Mdpi
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Personalized thermal comfort (PTC) systems aim to satisfy the individual thermal preferences of occupants rather than relying on average comfort indices. With the growing emphasis on sustainability and reducing energy consumption in buildings, energy efficiency has become a critical factor in the design and selection of PTC systems. While the development of PTC tools has accelerated in the last decade, selecting the most appropriate system remains a challenge due to the dynamic, uncertain, and multi-dimensional nature of the decision-making process. This study introduces a novel application of the KEMIRA-M multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method to identify the optimal PTC system for university office buildings-an area with limited prior investigation. A case study is conducted in a naturally ventilated office space located in a temperate climate zone. Eight distinct PTC alternatives are evaluated, including data-driven HVAC systems, wearable devices, and localized conditioning units. Six key criteria are considered: estimated energy consumption, capital cost, indoor and outdoor space requirements, system complexity, mobility, and energy efficiency. The results indicate that wearable wristbands, which condition the occupant's carpus area, offer the most balanced performance across criteria, while radiant ceiling/floor systems perform the poorest. Energy efficiency plays a crucial role in this evaluation, as it directly impacts both the operational cost and the environmental footprint of the system. The study's findings provide a structured and adaptable framework for HVAC engineers and designers to integrate PTC systems into occupant-centric and energy-efficient building designs.
Description
Keywords
Personalized Thermal Comfort, Kemira-M Method, Office Buildings, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tools, personalized thermal comfort, Building construction, KEMIRA-M method, office buildings, multi-criteria decision-making tools, TH1-9745
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Buildings
Volume
15
Issue
9
Start Page
1470
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
SCOPUS™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
2
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Page Views
8
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Downloads
52
checked on Feb 03, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
5.41155176
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

14
LIFE BELOW WATER

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS


