Effort Prediction for Microservices: a Case Study
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ieee
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Software size measurement is critical as an input to perform important project management processes such as effort, cost and schedule estimation. Functional size measurement (FSM) methods are beneficial in terms of being applicable in the early phases of the software life cycle over functional requirements and providing a systematic and repeatable method. However, in agile organizations, it can be challenging to seperate measurement components of FSM methods from requirements in the early phases as the documentation is kept to a minimum compared to traditional methods such as the Waterfall Model and is detailed as the project steps. In addition, the existing FSM methods are not fully compatible with today's architectural structures, which are from being data-driven and to evolve into a behaviour-oriented structure. In this study, we performed a case study which includes a project developed with agile methods and using microservice-based architecture to compare the effectiveness of COSMIC FSM and event-based software size measurement. For this purpose, we measured the size of the project and created effort estimation models based on two methods. The measurers had difficulty in applying both methods due to the limited detail level of the requirements in the project. However, the event-based method was found to estimate effort with less error than the COSMIC FSM method.
Description
Unlu, Huseyin/0000-0002-3079-4417
ORCID
Keywords
COSMIC, effort, size measurement, agile software development, event-based measurement
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Source
15th Turkish National Software Engineering Symposium (UYMS) -- NOV 17-19, 2021 -- ELECTR NETWORK
Volume
Issue
Start Page
121
End Page
126
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 3
Scopus : 4
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 25
SCOPUS™ Citations
4
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
3
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Feb 04, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
0.66252702
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

13
CLIMATE ACTION

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS

17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS


