Utilization of Three Software Size Measures for Effort Estimation in Agile World: A Case Study

dc.contributor.author Unlu, Huseyin
dc.contributor.author Hacaloglu, Tuna
dc.contributor.author Buber, Fatma
dc.contributor.author Berrak, Kivilcim
dc.contributor.author Leblebici, Onur
dc.contributor.author Demirors, Onur
dc.contributor.other Information Systems Engineering
dc.contributor.other 06. School Of Engineering
dc.contributor.other 01. Atılım University
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:49:59Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:49:59Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description.abstract Functional size measurement (FSM) methods, by being systematic and repeatable, are beneficial in the early phases of the software life cycle for core project management activities such as effort, cost, and schedule estimation. However, in agile projects, requirements are kept minimal in the early phases and are detailed over time as the project progresses. This situation makes it challenging to identify measurement components of FSM methods from requirements in the early phases, hence complicates applying FSM in agile projects. In addition, the existing FSM methods are not fully compatible with today's architectural styles, which are evolving into event-driven decentralized structures. In this study, we present the results of a case study to compare the effectiveness of different size measures: functional -COSMIC Function Points (CFP)-, event-based - Event Points-, and code length-based - Line of Code (LOC)- on projects that were developed with agile methods and utilized a microservice- based architecture. For this purpose, we measured the size of the project and created effort estimation models based on three methods. It is found that the event-based method estimated effort with better accuracy than the CFP and LOC-based methods. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [121E389] en_US
dc.description.sponsorship We would like to thank the support of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) ARDEB 1001 [Project number: 121E389] program. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00045
dc.identifier.isbn 9781665461528
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85147650110
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA56994.2022.00045
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.relation.ispartof 48th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications -- AUG 31-SEP 02, 2022 -- SPAIN en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.subject Microservices en_US
dc.subject Cosmic en_US
dc.subject Effort en_US
dc.subject Size Measurement en_US
dc.subject Agile Software Development en_US
dc.subject Event-Based Measurement en_US
dc.subject Line Of Code en_US
dc.title Utilization of Three Software Size Measures for Effort Estimation in Agile World: A Case Study en_US
dc.type Conference Object en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Leblebici, Özkan
gdc.author.institutional Hacaloğlu, Tuna
gdc.author.institutional Leblebici, Özkan
gdc.author.institutional Hacaloğlu, Tuna
gdc.author.scopusid 57521977500
gdc.author.scopusid 56422190200
gdc.author.scopusid 58096170300
gdc.author.scopusid 58095569100
gdc.author.scopusid 57220751565
gdc.author.scopusid 55949165100
gdc.author.wosid Demirors, Onur/R-7023-2016
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access metadata only access
gdc.coar.type text::conference output
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Unlu, Huseyin; Buber, Fatma; Berrak, Kivilcim; Demirors, Onur] Izmir Inst Technol, Dept Comp Engn, Izmir, Turkey; [Hacaloglu, Tuna] Atılım Univ, Informat Syst Engn, Ankara, Turkey; [Leblebici, Onur] Univera Inc, Izmir, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 246 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 239 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4316657695
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001440098900035
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 5.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.9214164E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 5.9689627E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.fwci 2.89
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.9
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 7
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 24
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 12
gdc.scopus.citedcount 12
gdc.wos.citedcount 7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 3624e3cf-d32c-4717-a257-344ccb177784
relation.isAuthorOfPublication d3ed58a9-ec7a-4537-bd73-68342f5537fe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 3624e3cf-d32c-4717-a257-344ccb177784
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication cf0fb36c-0500-438e-b4cc-ad1d4ef25579
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4abda634-67fd-417f-bee6-59c29fc99997
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery cf0fb36c-0500-438e-b4cc-ad1d4ef25579

Files

Collections