A Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing Sustainable Materials for Façades in Turkey and the European Union

dc.authorid Muntean, Radu/0000-0001-9404-4060
dc.authorid Barbulescu, Alina/0000-0001-9840-2443
dc.authorid Akcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369X
dc.authorscopusid 58905717100
dc.authorscopusid 55943374000
dc.authorscopusid 57194549917
dc.authorscopusid 57194605354
dc.authorwosid Muntean, Radu/AAM-3424-2020
dc.authorwosid Barbulescu, Alina/G-4385-2011
dc.contributor.author Daskin, Haney Basak
dc.contributor.author Barbulescu, Alina
dc.contributor.author Muntean, Radu
dc.contributor.author Akcay, Emre Caner
dc.contributor.other Civil Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:23:37Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:23:37Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Daskin, Haney Basak] Atilim Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye; [Barbulescu, Alina; Muntean, Radu] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Civil Engn, 5 Turnului Str, Brasov 500152, Romania; [Akcay, Emre Caner] Atilim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye en_US
dc.description Muntean, Radu/0000-0001-9404-4060; Barbulescu, Alina/0000-0001-9840-2443; Akcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369X en_US
dc.description.abstract One of the primary contributors to energy consumption is the construction industry. To address the urgent demand for eco-friendly approaches in this field, this study conducted an investigation on Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify the criteria for selecting sustainable materials for facades. Three groups of criteria were derived after a systematic review: Environmental, Social/economic and Technical. The main goal of the research was to answer the question of whether there are differences in these materials' selection between Turkey and European Union countries. After applying statistical tests, it was found that there are significant differences in selecting eco-friendly material only from the social/economic perspective. The most important sub-criterion is the economic cost. Comparisons with results from China and US confirm this finding. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su16041539
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue 4 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85185974175
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q2
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041539
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2337
dc.identifier.volume 16 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001172722900001
dc.identifier.wosquality Q2
dc.institutionauthor Akçay, Emre Caner
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Mdpi en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 2
dc.subject sustainable materials en_US
dc.subject facade en_US
dc.subject statistical tests en_US
dc.title A Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing Sustainable Materials for Façades in Turkey and the European Union en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 2
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication fd0cc919-74e3-41f9-868d-b5afbdc9d807
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery fd0cc919-74e3-41f9-868d-b5afbdc9d807
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing sustainability-16-01539.pdf
Size:
1.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections