A Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing Sustainable Materials for Façades in Turkey and the European Union

dc.authoridMuntean, Radu/0000-0001-9404-4060
dc.authoridBarbulescu, Alina/0000-0001-9840-2443
dc.authoridAkcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369X
dc.authorscopusid58905717100
dc.authorscopusid55943374000
dc.authorscopusid57194549917
dc.authorscopusid57194605354
dc.authorwosidMuntean, Radu/AAM-3424-2020
dc.authorwosidBarbulescu, Alina/G-4385-2011
dc.contributor.authorAkçay, Emre Caner
dc.contributor.authorBarbulescu, Alina
dc.contributor.authorMuntean, Radu
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Emre Caner
dc.contributor.otherCivil Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:23:37Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:23:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Daskin, Haney Basak] Atilim Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiye; [Barbulescu, Alina; Muntean, Radu] Transilvania Univ Brasov, Dept Civil Engn, 5 Turnului Str, Brasov 500152, Romania; [Akcay, Emre Caner] Atilim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionMuntean, Radu/0000-0001-9404-4060; Barbulescu, Alina/0000-0001-9840-2443; Akcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369Xen_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the primary contributors to energy consumption is the construction industry. To address the urgent demand for eco-friendly approaches in this field, this study conducted an investigation on Scopus and Web of Science databases to identify the criteria for selecting sustainable materials for facades. Three groups of criteria were derived after a systematic review: Environmental, Social/economic and Technical. The main goal of the research was to answer the question of whether there are differences in these materials' selection between Turkey and European Union countries. After applying statistical tests, it was found that there are significant differences in selecting eco-friendly material only from the social/economic perspective. The most important sub-criterion is the economic cost. Comparisons with results from China and US confirm this finding.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16041539
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85185974175
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su16041539
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2337
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001172722900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectsustainable materialsen_US
dc.subjectfacadeen_US
dc.subjectstatistical testsen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of the Criteria for Choosing Sustainable Materials for Façades in Turkey and the European Unionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfd0cc919-74e3-41f9-868d-b5afbdc9d807
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfd0cc919-74e3-41f9-868d-b5afbdc9d807
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d

Files

Collections