Ux Professionals' Definitions of Usability and Ux - a Comparison Between Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France and Malaysia
Loading...

Date
2017
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer international Publishing Ag
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper examines the views of user experience (UX) professionals on the definitions of usability and UX, and compares the findings between countries and within different socio-cultural groups. A mixed-method analysis was employed on data gathered on 422 professionals through a survey in Turkey, Finland, Denmark, France, and Malaysia. Usability appears to be an established concept, respondents across all countries agreeing on the importance of the ISO 9241-11 definition. There is also a tendency that UX professionals attach organizational perspective to usability. UX professionals diverge when defining UX, and there are systematic differences related to socio-cultural conditions. UX professionals in Finland and France incline more towards the definition highlighting the experiential qualities, when compared to Turkey and Malaysia that incline towards the definition reflecting the ease of use, utility, attractiveness, and degree of usage. Further research should address the implications of the diverse meanings and contexts of usability and UX.
Description
Clemmensen, Torkil/0000-0002-0934-2336; Rızvanoğlu, Kerem/0000-0002-6338-3649; Rajanen, Dorina/0000-0002-2816-0861; Sivaji, Ashok/0000-0002-4854-3683
Keywords
User experience, Usability, UX professional, Cross-cultural HCI, User experience, Cross-cultural HCI, Usability, UX professional
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
26
Source
16th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT) -- SEP 25-29, 2017 -- Indian Inst Technol, Mumbai, INDIA
Volume
10516
Issue
Start Page
218
End Page
239
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 20
Scopus : 41
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 93
SCOPUS™ Citations
41
checked on Apr 23, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
27
checked on Apr 23, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Apr 23, 2026
Google Scholar™


