Reducing the Spatial Distance Between Printed and Online Information Sources by Means of Mobile Technology Enhances Learning: Using 2d Barcodes
Loading...

Date
2011
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Online information sources, such as pictures and animations on web pages are frequently used for complementing printed course material in educational contexts. The concurrent use of online and printed information sources by students, however, requires going back and forth between physically separated course material, such as a course book and a computer screen, thus leading to suboptimal learning outcomes. Compatible with the principles identified by the recent theoretical frameworks for multimedia learning, mobile technology provides learners with the opportunity to bring online and printed course material close together. Mobile phones make online information available within a small desktop space, in close proximity to printed course material. The challenges that are relevant to text input methods can be overcome by the 2D barcode technology. This study investigates the use of camera-equipped mobile phone and 2D barcode technology as an alternative to the use of computer screen for complementing printed course material. The results of the experimental investigation suggest that, by facilitating the access to online information sources by 2D barcode tags on course books, mobile phones have the potential to enhance learning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Ozcelik, Erol/0000-0003-0370-8517; Acartürk, Cengiz/0000-0002-5443-6868;
Keywords
Multimedia learning, Mobile learning, Spatial contiguity, 2D barcodes
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences, 0503 education
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
70
Source
Computers & Education
Volume
57
Issue
3
Start Page
2077
End Page
2085
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 29
Scopus : 72
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 168
Google Scholar™


