Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy Mcdm Approach: a Theoretical Framework

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2018

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Hindawi Ltd

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In complex decision making, using multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies is the most scientific way to ensure an informed and justified decision between several alternatives. MCDMs have been used in different ways and with several applications that proved their efficiency in achieving this goal. In this research, the advantages and disadvantages of the different MCDM methodologies are studied, along with the different techniques implemented to increase their accuracy and precision. The main aim of the study is to develop a hybrid MCDM process that combines the strengths of several MCDM methods and apply it to choose the best fit maintenance policy/strategy for industrial application. Moreover, fuzzy linguistic terms are utilized in all of the used MCDM techniques in order to eliminate the uncertainty and ambiguity of the results. Through an extensive literature review performed on studies that have used MCDM methods in a hybrid context and using fuzzy linguistic terms, a model is developed to use fuzzy DEMATEL-AHP-TOPSIS hybrid technique. The model with its application is the first of its kind, which combines the strengths of fuzzy DEMATEL in establishing interrelationships between several criteria, as well as performing a pairwise comparison between the criteria for prioritization using the fuzzy AHP method. Thereafter, the alternatives are compared using fuzzy TOPSIS method by establishing negative and positive solutions and calculating the relative closeness for each of the alternatives. Furthermore, six main criteria, twenty criteria, and five alternatives are selected from the literature for the model application.

Description

Erdebilli, Babek/0000-0001-8860-3903

Keywords

[No Keyword Available], Ambiguity, Artificial intelligence, Maintenance Optimization, Environmental Decision Making, Social Sciences, Group Decision Making, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Management Science and Operations Research, Operations research, Pairwise comparison, Mathematical analysis, Decision Sciences, Engineering, Context (archaeology), FOS: Mathematics, Risk analysis (engineering), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Materials Engineering in Industrial Applications, TOPSIS, Biology, MCDM Methods, Analytic hierarchy process, Paleontology, Closeness, QA75.5-76.95, Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Computer science, Reliability Engineering and Maintenance Optimization, Process (computing), Management science, Programming language, Fuzzy logic, Operating system, Mechanics of Materials, Electronic computers. Computer science, Physical Sciences, Medicine, Mathematics

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

Citation

WoS Q

Q2

Scopus Q

Q1
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
26

Source

Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing

Volume

2018

Issue

Start Page

1

End Page

14

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 31

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 110

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.87881517

Sustainable Development Goals

1

NO POVERTY
NO POVERTY Logo

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

7

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo

17

PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS Logo