Design Team Effectiveness and Architects' Personality Types

dc.authoridArditi, David/0000-0002-1580-324X
dc.authoridAkcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369X
dc.authorscopusid59527744900
dc.authorscopusid35614735000
dc.authorscopusid6506183449
dc.authorscopusid57194605354
dc.authorwosidArditi, David/AAF-4608-2021
dc.contributor.authorAlan, Ece
dc.contributor.authorArditi, David
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Husnu Murat
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Emre Caner
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T18:35:57Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T18:35:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Alan, Ece; Arditi, David] Illinois Inst Technol, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Chicago, IL USA; [Gunaydin, Husnu Murat] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Architecture, Istanbul, Turkiye; [Akcay, Emre Caner] Atilim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionArditi, David/0000-0002-1580-324X; Akcay, Emre Caner/0000-0003-4426-369Xen_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeThe personalities of the design team members constitute one of the factors that influence team effectiveness. In this study, 223 members of the "American Institute of Architects" who are employed by the largest architectural design firms in the United States of America were categorized according to their personality types by using "The Enneagram Personality Type Model." Also, the respondents' opinions about eight team effectiveness outcomes were recorded in order to explore the relationship between team members' personality types and team effectiveness outcomes.Design/methodology/approachThe information was collected by a questionnaire where the first part included 144 pairs of statements that were used to identify respondents' personality types. The second part sought designers' opinions about the importance of eight team effectiveness outcomes rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. The results were assessed by performing the Kruskal-Wallis test first and Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment subsequently.FindingsThe findings highlight the significance of personality types in effective design teams. While Type 6 (loyalist and skeptic) and Type 3 (achiever and performer) architects prioritize team effectiveness the most, Type 7 architects (enthusiasts and epicureans) assign the lowest importance. However, the presence of Type 1 (reformist and perfectionist) and Type 8 (challenger and protector) architects within the same design team may involve challenges or conflicts.Originality/valueThe primary contribution of this study is that it is the first study in the construction management literature that utilizes The Enneagram of Personality Test to understand the relationship between team members' personality types and team effectiveness outcomes. This study is of direct relevance to practitioners and could be utilized in design team-building activities.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexScience Citation Index Expanded - Social Science Citation Index
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/ECAM-12-2023-1264
dc.identifier.issn0969-9988
dc.identifier.issn1365-232X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216011103
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2023-1264
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10416
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001400742200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorAkcay, Emre Caner
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitecten_US
dc.subjectDesign teamen_US
dc.subjectEnneagramen_US
dc.subjectPersonality typesen_US
dc.titleDesign Team Effectiveness and Architects' Personality Typesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections