Comparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA Part 3: Inferior and anterior repositioning surgery

dc.authoridERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authorscopusid8250449600
dc.authorscopusid24401051800
dc.authorscopusid57196871123
dc.authorscopusid8520541100
dc.authorwosidErkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, E.
dc.contributor.authorAtac, M. S.
dc.contributor.authorYucel, E.
dc.contributor.authorKurt, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T14:33:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T14:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Erkmen, E.; Atac, M. S.; Yucel, E.] Gazi Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, 82 Sok, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, A.] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281en_US
dc.description.abstractHaving studied the effect of maxillary advancement and maxillary impaction in parts 1 and 2 of this research, the purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of different fixation models in inferiorly and anteriorly repositioned maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy. Two separate three-dimensional finite element models, simulating the inferiorly advanced maxilla at Le Fort 1 level, were used to compare 2- and 4-plate fixation. Model INF-2 resulted in 247 897 elements and 53 247 nodes and INF-4 consisted of 273 130 elements and 59 917 nodes. The stresses occurring in and around the bone and plate-screw complex were computed. The highest Von Mises stresses on the plates and maximum principal stresses on the bones were found in INF-2, especially under horizontal and oblique loads, when compared with INF-4. The present biomechanical study shows that the traditionally used 4-plate fixation technique, following Le Fort I inferior and anterior repositioning surgery, Without bone grafting, provides fewer stress fields on the maxillary bones and fixation materials.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGazi University Scientific Researches Foundation [03/2004-19]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was Supported by a grant from the Gazi University Scientific Researches Foundation (03/2004-19).en_US
dc.identifier.citation18
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.006
dc.identifier.endpage179en_US
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19046852
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-59849105951
dc.identifier.startpage173en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/993
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000264020900010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstoneen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subject3D finite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectLe Fort I osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectinferior repositioning surgeryen_US
dc.subjectinternal fixationen_US
dc.titleComparison of biomechanical behaviour of maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy with 2-versus 4-plate fixation using 3D-FEA Part 3: Inferior and anterior repositioning surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections