Numerical Simulation of Various Cross Sectional Workpieces Using Conventional Deep Drawing and Hydroforming Technologies

dc.authorid Tekkaya, Erman/0000-0002-5197-2948
dc.authorscopusid 57207555172
dc.authorscopusid 7003877035
dc.authorwosid Tekkaya, Erman/HLW-4882-2023
dc.contributor.author Onder, Erkan
dc.contributor.author Tekkaya, A. Erman
dc.contributor.other Manufacturing Engineering
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T14:34:06Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T14:34:06Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Tekkaya, A. Erman] ATILIM Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey; [Onder, Erkan] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description Tekkaya, Erman/0000-0002-5197-2948 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study focuses on the determination of optimum sheet metal forming process and process parameters for various cross sectional workpieces by comparing the numerical results of high-pressure sheet metal forming, hydro-mechanical deep drawing (DD) and conventional DD simulations. Within the range of each cross section, depth, characteristic dimensions ratio and fillet radius have been altered systematically. Steel of types St14 and DC04 have been used as the specimen material in the numerical analyses and the experimental verification throughout the study. All numerical simulations have been carried out by using a dynamic-explicit commercial finite element code and an elasto-plastic material model. During the analyses each workpiece was simulated by the three competing processes. The results of analyses, such as sheet thickness distribution, necking, forming of radii etc., are used for assessing the success of each forming process alternative. The analyses revealed that depending on the workpiece geometry and dimensional properties certain processes are preferable for obtaining more satisfactory products. Working windows for each process have been established based on the analyzed parameters of the circular, elliptic, rectangular and square cross sectional product geometries. This data is expected to be useful for selecting the appropriate production process for a given workpiece geometry and understand the limits of each sheet metal forming processes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 42
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.012
dc.identifier.endpage 542 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0890-6955
dc.identifier.issn 1879-2170
dc.identifier.issue 5 en_US
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-38849168093
dc.identifier.startpage 532 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.012
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1019
dc.identifier.volume 48 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000253790800006
dc.identifier.wosquality Q1
dc.institutionauthor Tekkaya, Ahmet Eeman
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier Sci Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 48
dc.subject deep drawing en_US
dc.subject hydroforming en_US
dc.subject aquadrawing en_US
dc.subject forming limits en_US
dc.subject dynamic - explicit FEM en_US
dc.title Numerical Simulation of Various Cross Sectional Workpieces Using Conventional Deep Drawing and Hydroforming Technologies en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 41
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418

Files

Collections