Numerical simulation of various cross sectional workpieces using conventional deep drawing and hydroforming technologies

dc.authoridTekkaya, Erman/0000-0002-5197-2948
dc.authorscopusid57207555172
dc.authorscopusid7003877035
dc.authorwosidTekkaya, Erman/HLW-4882-2023
dc.contributor.authorTekkaya, Ahmet Eeman
dc.contributor.authorTekkaya, A. Erman
dc.contributor.otherManufacturing Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T14:34:06Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T14:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Tekkaya, A. Erman] ATILIM Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Ankara, Turkey; [Onder, Erkan] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionTekkaya, Erman/0000-0002-5197-2948en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on the determination of optimum sheet metal forming process and process parameters for various cross sectional workpieces by comparing the numerical results of high-pressure sheet metal forming, hydro-mechanical deep drawing (DD) and conventional DD simulations. Within the range of each cross section, depth, characteristic dimensions ratio and fillet radius have been altered systematically. Steel of types St14 and DC04 have been used as the specimen material in the numerical analyses and the experimental verification throughout the study. All numerical simulations have been carried out by using a dynamic-explicit commercial finite element code and an elasto-plastic material model. During the analyses each workpiece was simulated by the three competing processes. The results of analyses, such as sheet thickness distribution, necking, forming of radii etc., are used for assessing the success of each forming process alternative. The analyses revealed that depending on the workpiece geometry and dimensional properties certain processes are preferable for obtaining more satisfactory products. Working windows for each process have been established based on the analyzed parameters of the circular, elliptic, rectangular and square cross sectional product geometries. This data is expected to be useful for selecting the appropriate production process for a given workpiece geometry and understand the limits of each sheet metal forming processes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citation42
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.012
dc.identifier.endpage542en_US
dc.identifier.issn0890-6955
dc.identifier.issn1879-2170
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38849168093
dc.identifier.startpage532en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.012
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/1019
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000253790800006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdeep drawingen_US
dc.subjecthydroformingen_US
dc.subjectaquadrawingen_US
dc.subjectforming limitsen_US
dc.subjectdynamic - explicit FEMen_US
dc.titleNumerical simulation of various cross sectional workpieces using conventional deep drawing and hydroforming technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery56cd564d-885b-4583-9ab3-d365598e205d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9804a563-7f37-4a61-92b1-e24b3f0d8418

Files

Collections