Numerical Simulation of Various Cross Sectional Workpieces Using Conventional Deep Drawing and Hydroforming Technologies
Loading...

Date
2008
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study focuses on the determination of optimum sheet metal forming process and process parameters for various cross sectional workpieces by comparing the numerical results of high-pressure sheet metal forming, hydro-mechanical deep drawing (DD) and conventional DD simulations. Within the range of each cross section, depth, characteristic dimensions ratio and fillet radius have been altered systematically. Steel of types St14 and DC04 have been used as the specimen material in the numerical analyses and the experimental verification throughout the study. All numerical simulations have been carried out by using a dynamic-explicit commercial finite element code and an elasto-plastic material model. During the analyses each workpiece was simulated by the three competing processes. The results of analyses, such as sheet thickness distribution, necking, forming of radii etc., are used for assessing the success of each forming process alternative. The analyses revealed that depending on the workpiece geometry and dimensional properties certain processes are preferable for obtaining more satisfactory products. Working windows for each process have been established based on the analyzed parameters of the circular, elliptic, rectangular and square cross sectional product geometries. This data is expected to be useful for selecting the appropriate production process for a given workpiece geometry and understand the limits of each sheet metal forming processes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Tekkaya, Erman/0000-0002-5197-2948
ORCID
Keywords
deep drawing, hydroforming, aquadrawing, forming limits, dynamic - explicit FEM
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 0203 mechanical engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
34
Source
International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
Volume
48
Issue
5
Start Page
532
End Page
542
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 24
Scopus : 50
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 46
SCOPUS™ Citations
50
checked on Feb 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
42
checked on Feb 09, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


