Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part Two: Superior Repositioning Surgery With Bone Allograft

dc.authoridERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281
dc.authoridKilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830
dc.authorscopusid24171196000
dc.authorscopusid8250449600
dc.authorscopusid8520541100
dc.authorwosidKılınç, Yeliz/AAP-6529-2021
dc.authorwosidErkmen, Erkan/AAP-8242-2021
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorErkmen, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T14:31:27Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T14:31:27Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Kilinc, Yeliz; Erkmen, Erkan] Gazi Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Biskek Cd 8 Cd 82 Sk 4, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Fac Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionERKMEN, Erkan/0000-0002-4746-5281; Kilinc, Yeliz/0000-0003-2853-7830en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the biomechanical behavior of different fixation methods used to fix the mandibular anterior segment following various amounts of superior repositioning was evaluated by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The three-dimensional finite element models representing 3 and 5mm superior repositioning were generated. The gap in between segments was assumed to be filled by block bone allograft and resignated to be in perfect contact with the mandible and segmented bone. Six different finite element models with 2 distinct mobilization rate including 3 different fixation configurations, double right L (DRL), double left L (DLL), or double I (DI) miniplates with monocortical screws, correspondingly were created. A comparative evaluation has been made under vertical, horizontal and oblique loads. The von Mises and principal maximum stress (P-max) values were calculated by finite element solver programme. The first part of our ongoing Finite Element Analysis research has been adressed to the mechanical behavior of the same fixation configurations in nongrafted models. In comparison with the findings of the first part of the study, it was concluded that bone graft offers superior mechanical stability without any limitation of mobilization and less stress on the fixative appliances as well as in the bone.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGazi University Scientific Research Foundation [03/2010-17]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a Grant from the Gazi University Scientific Research Foundation (03/2010-17).en_US
dc.identifier.citation7
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0000000000002173
dc.identifier.endpage40en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26703029
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84957074670
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage36en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002173
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/686
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000370075700007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectbone graftingen_US
dc.subjectfinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectjaw fixation techniquesen_US
dc.subjectmandibular osteotomyen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Mandibular Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Using Finite Element Analysis, Part Two: Superior Repositioning Surgery With Bone Allograften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections