Effects of Lotrafilcon a and Senofilcon a Bandage Contact Lenses on Visual Outcome and Ocular Comfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy

dc.authorscopusid37008120700
dc.authorscopusid57203002532
dc.contributor.authorYakar, Konuralp
dc.contributor.authorAlacamli, Goeksu
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-05T18:36:07Z
dc.date.available2025-02-05T18:36:07Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Yakar, Konuralp] Atilim Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Alacamli, Goeksu] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Mugla, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the efficacy of two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses (BCLs) in terms of visual rehabilitation and ocular discomfort following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 60 eyes of 30 patients who underwent bilateral PRK surgery to correct myopia and/ or astigmatism refractive errors. Following surgery, lotrafilcon A BCLs were applied to the right eye and senofilcon A BCLs were applied to the left eye. When the BCLs were removed on postoperative day 5, subjective ocular symptoms of discomfort were evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no discomfort and 10 indicated maximum discomfort. The postoperative spherical equivalents (SE) of both eyes were compared at 15 days and 1 month. Postoperative SE <= +/- 0.50 diopters was accepted as emmetropia. The number of patients who achieved emmetropia was also compared at 15 days and 1 month postoperatively. Results: Scores for ocular discomfort in the first 5 days postoperatively did not differ significantly between the BCLs (p>0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two lenses in terms of SE values at postoperative 15 days and 1 month (p<0.05). Eyes fitted with the senofilcon A BCL demonstrated better postoperative visual rehabilitation. Conclusion: Although post-PRK ocular discomfort scores did not differ significantly between the two BCLs, the senofilcon A lenses performed better in terms of achieving the target SE postoperatively.en_US
dc.description.woscitationindexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citationcount0
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.03392
dc.identifier.endpage323en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0659
dc.identifier.issn2147-2661
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid39743926
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85214326278
dc.identifier.startpage318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.03392
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10418
dc.identifier.volume54en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001390134600002
dc.institutionauthorYakar, Konuralp
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectLotrafilcon Aen_US
dc.subjectsenofilcon Aen_US
dc.subjectbandage contact lensen_US
dc.subjectphotorefractive keratectomyen_US
dc.subjectrefractive errorsen_US
dc.titleEffects of Lotrafilcon a and Senofilcon a Bandage Contact Lenses on Visual Outcome and Ocular Comfort After Photorefractive Keratectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections