Effects of Lotrafilcon a and Senofilcon a Bandage Contact Lenses on Visual Outcome and Ocular Comfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy

dc.authorscopusid 37008120700
dc.authorscopusid 57203002532
dc.contributor.author Yakar, Konuralp
dc.contributor.author Alacamli, Goeksu
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-05T18:36:07Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-05T18:36:07Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Yakar, Konuralp] Atilim Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Ankara, Turkiye; [Alacamli, Goeksu] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Mugla, Turkiye en_US
dc.description.abstract Objectives: To compare the efficacy of two different silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses (BCLs) in terms of visual rehabilitation and ocular discomfort following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 60 eyes of 30 patients who underwent bilateral PRK surgery to correct myopia and/ or astigmatism refractive errors. Following surgery, lotrafilcon A BCLs were applied to the right eye and senofilcon A BCLs were applied to the left eye. When the BCLs were removed on postoperative day 5, subjective ocular symptoms of discomfort were evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no discomfort and 10 indicated maximum discomfort. The postoperative spherical equivalents (SE) of both eyes were compared at 15 days and 1 month. Postoperative SE <= +/- 0.50 diopters was accepted as emmetropia. The number of patients who achieved emmetropia was also compared at 15 days and 1 month postoperatively. Results: Scores for ocular discomfort in the first 5 days postoperatively did not differ significantly between the BCLs (p>0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two lenses in terms of SE values at postoperative 15 days and 1 month (p<0.05). Eyes fitted with the senofilcon A BCL demonstrated better postoperative visual rehabilitation. Conclusion: Although post-PRK ocular discomfort scores did not differ significantly between the two BCLs, the senofilcon A lenses performed better in terms of achieving the target SE postoperatively. en_US
dc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
dc.identifier.citationcount 0
dc.identifier.doi 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.03392
dc.identifier.endpage 323 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1300-0659
dc.identifier.issn 2147-2661
dc.identifier.issue 6 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 39743926
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85214326278
dc.identifier.startpage 318 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.03392
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10418
dc.identifier.volume 54 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:001390134600002
dc.institutionauthor Yakar, Konuralp
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Galenos Publ House en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 0
dc.subject Lotrafilcon A en_US
dc.subject senofilcon A en_US
dc.subject bandage contact lens en_US
dc.subject photorefractive keratectomy en_US
dc.subject refractive errors en_US
dc.title Effects of Lotrafilcon a and Senofilcon a Bandage Contact Lenses on Visual Outcome and Ocular Comfort After Photorefractive Keratectomy en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 0
dspace.entity.type Publication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication b5c4bf34-bc72-42c2-a55d-456a6bc1b67b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery b5c4bf34-bc72-42c2-a55d-456a6bc1b67b

Files

Collections