Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation

dc.authoridAYDIN, CANSET/0000-0001-6288-636X
dc.authorscopusid57222426930
dc.authorscopusid57189728506
dc.authorscopusid57224580846
dc.authorscopusid57224591153
dc.authorscopusid55962870900
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Canset
dc.contributor.authorOnay, Ovsen
dc.contributor.authorTezcan, Elif Ilkay
dc.contributor.authorAskar, Zuhal
dc.contributor.authorOzdek, Ali
dc.contributor.otherSurgical Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:19:44Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Aydin, Canset] Medicana Int Hosp, ENT Clin, Ankara, Turkey; [Onay, Ovsen] Atilim Univ, Fac Med, Dept ENT, Ankara, Turkey; [Tezcan, Elif Ilkay; Askar, Zuhal; Ozdek, Ali] Ankara Otol & Neurotol Private Clin, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionAYDIN, CANSET/0000-0001-6288-636Xen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the effectiveness of chirp and tone burst stimuli in oVEMP and cVEMP testing for healthy adults Methods This study was conducted in 56 healthy volunteers (112 ears). Ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP, cVEMP) tests were performed for each participant using tone burst and chirp stimuli. VEMP response rates, latency of each peak (p1-n1, n1-p1), peak to peak amplitude (p1-n1 amplitude and n1-p1 amplitude), and rectified amplitudes were measured and compared between these two different stimuli. Results VEMP response rates with chirp stimuli are higher than the tone burst stimuli for both cVEMP and oVEMP tests (The difference was statistically significant for oVEMP, p = 0.001). Chirp stimuli have higher p1n1 amplitude and rectified amplitude and shorter p1and n1 latency then tone burst stimuli for cVEMP (p = 0.015, p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Chirp stimuli also have higher n1p1 amplitude and shorter n1and p1 latency then tone burst stimuli for oVEMP (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The present findings show that the chirp stimulus triggers earlier VEMP responses with higher amplitudes than the tone burst stimulus during cVEMP and oVEMP testing. VEMP response rate with chirp stimulus is also higher than the tone burst. Therefore chirp stimulus can be used in VEMP testing as effectively as, if not more than, tone burst stimulus in clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citation8
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-021-06936-w
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.issn1434-4726
dc.identifier.pmid34129084
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107990847
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06936-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2012
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000661813000003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Canset
dc.institutionauthorÖnay, Övsen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcVEMPen_US
dc.subjectoVEMPen_US
dc.subjectVestibular testen_US
dc.subjectChirpen_US
dc.subjectTone bursten_US
dc.titleComparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b967220-49ec-4e80-ac3d-dcc8206582f6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa513e31e-ecd5-4495-8307-3dc65d715274
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b967220-49ec-4e80-ac3d-dcc8206582f6
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa496aaf0-0817-4258-97e0-1fbdc4cc0841
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya496aaf0-0817-4258-97e0-1fbdc4cc0841

Files

Collections