Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Loop Bipartition and Transit Bipartition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Obesity: A Retrospective Analysis

dc.authoridDemir, Canan/0000-0001-7459-3636
dc.authorscopusid56640960500
dc.authorscopusid55982844500
dc.authorscopusid57223187926
dc.authorscopusid7801356220
dc.authorscopusid14424014000
dc.authorwosiddemir, canan cicek/JBF-7113-2023
dc.authorwosiddemir, canan cicek/AAK-4857-2021
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Canan
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ergin
dc.contributor.authorSariyildiz, Guelcin
dc.contributor.authorAnil, Cueneyd
dc.contributor.authorBanli, Oktay
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:21:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Demir, Canan] Atilim Univ, Sch Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Ankara, Turkiye; [Arslan, Ergin; Banli, Oktay] Ankara Obes Surg Clin, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkiye; [Sariyildiz, Guelcin] Atilim Univ, Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, Dept Gen Surg, Ankara, Turkiye; [Anil, Cueneyd] Guven Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Ankara, Turkiye; [Demir, Canan] Atilim Univ, Tip Fak, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, TR-06830 Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.descriptionDemir, Canan/0000-0001-7459-3636en_US
dc.description.abstractAim:We aimed to compare 1-year postoperative results of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (LSG-TB) and transit loop bipartition (LSG-TLB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB). Patients and Methods:This is a retrospective comparison of 2 novel bariatric surgery techniques with MGB. Primary outcome measure of the study was a rate of T2DM remission. Secondary outcomes included excess body mass index (BMI) loss, improvement in hepatosteatosis, and duration of operation. Revision surgery needs were also assessed. Results:Overall, 32 patients underwent the LSG-TLB, 15 underwent LSG-TB, and 50 underwent MGB. Mean age and sex distribution were comparable for all groups. Presurgical BMI was similar in MGB and LSG + TB groups, whereas LSG + TLB group had significantly lower BMI values compared with the MGB group. In both groups, BMI values reduced significantly compared with respective baseline values. Excess BMI loss was significantly higher in patients who underwent LSG-TLB compared with patients treated with LSG-TB and MGB. Bariatric surgery procedures lasted shorter in LSG-TLB than in LSG-TB. However, the shortest of all was MGB. The remission of T2DM rates were 71% and 73.3% in LSG-TLB and LSG-TB groups, respectively (P > 9.999). The rate of revision surgeries was comparable in both groups. Conclusion:In conclusion, LSG-TLB took less time and provided significantly higher excess BMI loss compared with LSG-TB. T2DM remission and improvement rates were similar in both groups. LSG-TLB seemed like a promising bariatric surgery technique in patients with obesity and T2DM.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLE.0000000000001189
dc.identifier.endpage364en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-4515
dc.identifier.issn1534-4908
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37343192
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85167843644
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage357en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001189
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2141
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001044596800007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbariatric surgeryen_US
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectobesityen_US
dc.subjecttransit bipartitionen_US
dc.subjecttransit loop bipartitionen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Loop Bipartition and Transit Bipartition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Obesity: A Retrospective Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0eb04ede-751a-46c2-9085-c71fb14bbf04
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0eb04ede-751a-46c2-9085-c71fb14bbf04

Files

Collections