How do visual, auditory and motor dual-tasking each affect swallowing and chewing function?

dc.authorscopusid59139012400
dc.authorscopusid57188852561
dc.contributor.authorBegen, Sena Nur
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Selen Serel
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:23:12Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Begen, Sena Nur; Arslan, Selen Serel] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiye; [Begen, Sena Nur] Atilim Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkiyeen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: It can be challenging to perform a second task at the same time as swallowing. Objective(s)The study aimed to investigate the effect of visual, auditory and motor dual-tasking on swallowing and chewing function in healthy young adults. Method: Right-handed healthy adults without any psychological and cognitive problems were included in the study. Swallowing was evaluated based on the dysphagia limit in different liquid textures such as water and nectar consistencies, and chewing was evaluated by the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids. For the second task, visual and auditory performance was assessed using reaction time, and the motor performance was assessed using a bilateral tapping task. Assessments were performed in two steps: baseline and dual-task. For baseline, all evaluation methods were applied individually. After completing the baseline assessment, dual-task assessment were carried out the following day. For dual-task assessment, the swallowing and chewing tasks were performed simultaneously with visual, auditory and motor tasks. Results: Results showed a significant decrease in dysphagia limit in the nectar consistency, and significant increase in chewing time, visual reaction time and tapping rate (right-left) when compared to baseline and dual-task conditions (chi(2)(3) = 9.61, p = .02; chi(2)(3) = 9.02, p = .02; chi(2)(3) = 28.09, p < .001; chi(2)(3) = 28.97, p < .001; chi(2)(3) = 21.56, p < .001, respectively). However, there were no differences in dysphagia limit in the water and auditory reaction time compared to baseline and dual-task conditions (chi(2)(3) = 3.18, p = .36; chi(2)(3) = 2.56, p = .50, respectively). Conclusion: Results shedding light on how simultaneous dual tasks can influence swallowing and chewing. Dual-tasking cause a decrease in both swallowing/chewing and the visual/motor performances. These results may provide valuable information for designing interventions or strategies aimed at improving or maintaining optimal swallowing and chewing during in various populations during daily life.en_US
dc.identifier.citation0
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joor.13697
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842
dc.identifier.pmid38783600
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85193936625
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13697
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2282
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001229943200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectchewingen_US
dc.subjectdual-tasken_US
dc.subjectdual-task interactionen_US
dc.subjectreaction timeen_US
dc.subjectswallowen_US
dc.titleHow do visual, auditory and motor dual-tasking each affect swallowing and chewing function?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb02a7519-753b-4a11-beda-d4b6e3d3bca3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb02a7519-753b-4a11-beda-d4b6e3d3bca3

Files

Collections