Comparison of Countries in the Who European Region According To Noncommunicable Disease Indicators by Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

dc.contributor.author Bulut, Tevfik
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-05T15:34:31Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-05T15:34:31Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the relative risk prevalence of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in the countries of the European Region as defined by WHO (World Health Organization) using WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) and MULTIMOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis plus the full Multiplicative Form) multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study’s target population consisted of 50 countries in the WHO European Region with complete observations. The study utilizes NCDs data that the WHO publicly released. Analysis was performed using the R programming language and Microsoft Excel. Results: Based on the CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercorrelated Corrected) weighted WASPAS analysis, it was observed that 24 European countries exhibited Q scores above the average, while 26 countries displayed Q scores below the average. Finland, Cyprus, Switzerland, Spain, Iceland, Iceland, Sweden, Slovenia, Italy, Norway, Latvia, Portugal, Luxembourg, Belgium, France, Greece, the Netherlands, Germany, Malta, Austria, Ireland, Israel, Lithuania, Israel, Lithuania and Estonia have the highest Q scores. Twenty-four countries with above- average Q scores have lower NCD prevalence than twenty-six European countries. In Türkiye, the prevalence of NCDs is above the European average. However, Switzerland, Finland, Iceland, Spain, Cyprus, Slovenia, Sweden, Portugal, Norway, and Luxembourg are among the top 10 European countries with the lowest NCD prevalence in the overall MULTIMOORA ranking. According to the overall ranking, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan have the highest NCD prevalence. Conclusions: The findings from the CRITIC based WASPAS method and the CRITIC based MULTIMOORA indicate that the prevalence of NCDs generally varies according to income level. Higher-income countries note a lower prevalence of NCDs compared to those with lower income levels. Nonetheless, the prevalence of NCDs may differ among various socioeconomic groups en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.32552/2025.ActaMedica.1067
dc.identifier.issn 2147-9488
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.32552/2025.ActaMedica.1067
dc.identifier.uri https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1332356/comparison-of-countries-in-the-who-european-region-according-to-noncommunicable-disease-indicators-by-multi-criteria-decision-making-methods
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/10812
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Acta Medica en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.title Comparison of Countries in the Who European Region According To Noncommunicable Disease Indicators by Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Bulut, Tevfik
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp Atılım Üniversitesi en_US
gdc.description.endpage 69 en_US
gdc.description.issue 2 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality N/A
gdc.description.startpage 56 en_US
gdc.description.volume 56 en_US
gdc.description.wosquality N/A
gdc.identifier.openalex W4411621264
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 1332356
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4895952E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.7494755E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.23
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd

Files

Collections