Biomechanical Comparison of Sinus Floor Elevation and Alternative Treatment Methods for Dental Implant Placement

dc.authorid Kucukkurt, Sercan/0000-0002-4095-957X
dc.authorscopusid 57090791700
dc.authorscopusid 6602993423
dc.authorscopusid 8520541100
dc.authorwosid Alpaslan, Gokhan/AAA-3036-2022
dc.authorwosid Kucukkurt, Sercan/A-1752-2017
dc.contributor.author Kucukkurt, Sercan
dc.contributor.author Alpaslan, Goekhan
dc.contributor.author Kurt, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T14:30:41Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T14:30:41Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.department Atılım University en_US
dc.department-temp [Kucukkurt, Sercan] Istanbul Aydn Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey; [Alpaslan, Goekhan] Gazi Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Fac Dent, Ankara, Turkey; [Kurt, Ahmet] Atilim Univ, Dept Mfg Engn, Fac Engn, Ankara, Turkey en_US
dc.description Kucukkurt, Sercan/0000-0002-4095-957X en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective: In this study, we compared the success of sinus lifting and alternative treatment methods in applying dental implants in cases lacking adequate bone due to pneumatization of the maxillary sinus. Methods: In a computer environment, 3D models were created using computerized tomography data from a patient. Additionally, implants and abutments were scanned at the macroscopic level, and the resulting images were transferred to the 3D models. Five different models were examined: a control model, lateral sinus lifting (LSL), short dental implant placement (SIP), tilted implant placement (TIP) and distal prosthetic cantilever (DC) use. Vertical and oblique forces were applied in each model. The compression, tension and von Mises stresses in each model were analyzed by implementing a finite element analysis method. Results: In our study, the LSL method was observed to be the closest to the control model. The TIP model showed high stress values under conditions of oblique forces but showed successful results under conditions of vertical forces, and the opposite results were observed in the SIP model. The DC model provided the least successful results among all models. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, the LSL method should be the first choice among treatment options. Considering its successful results under conditions of oblique forces, the SIP method may be preferable to the TIP method. In contrast, every effort should be made to avoid the use of DCs. en_US
dc.identifier.citationcount 9
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/10255842.2016.1218482
dc.identifier.endpage 293 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1025-5842
dc.identifier.issn 1476-8259
dc.identifier.issue 3 en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 27501343
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-84981165940
dc.identifier.scopusquality Q3
dc.identifier.startpage 284 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2016.1218482
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/600
dc.identifier.volume 20 en_US
dc.identifier.wos WOS:000392582400006
dc.identifier.wosquality Q4
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess en_US
dc.scopus.citedbyCount 14
dc.subject Dental implants en_US
dc.subject sinus floor augmentation en_US
dc.subject dental stress analysis en_US
dc.subject finite element analysis en_US
dc.title Biomechanical Comparison of Sinus Floor Elevation and Alternative Treatment Methods for Dental Implant Placement en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.wos.citedbyCount 10
dspace.entity.type Publication

Files

Collections