An Investigation on Task Difficulty: Does Task Difficulty Depend on the Technology Used in Task Completion?
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Previous research indicates that task difficulty (i.e., students' judgments on a task's complexity) impacts their task performance. However, whether students' perceived task difficulty changes depending on the technology they use when completing tasks is still under investigation. The present study aims to address this gap in the literature. One hundred twenty-three students completed the study procedures. Students were randomly assigned to one of four groups (one control group and three experimental groups). Students were not allowed to use any technology in the control group. In contrast, those in experimental groups were permitted to use one of the following tools: e-textbook, Google, and ChatGPT. Students in each group completed three tasks with different complexities in the same order. The data was analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. The study revealed a significant interaction effect between groups and task difficulty perceptions at three levels. In all groups, perceived difficulty increased as the task complexity increased, but the change in students' perceived task difficulty across three tasks was impacted by the tool used when completing the tasks. © 2024 Owner/Author.
Description
ACM SIGCSE; Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Keywords
generative AI, task difficulty, task performance
Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
SIGCSE 2024 - Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education -- 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2024 -- 20 March 2024 through 23 March 2024 -- Portland -- 197936
Volume
2
Issue
Start Page
1552
End Page
1553
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
SCOPUS™ Citations
1
checked on Jan 31, 2026
Page Views
6
checked on Jan 31, 2026
Google Scholar™

OpenAlex FWCI
3.55938526
Sustainable Development Goals
3
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING

4
QUALITY EDUCATION

5
GENDER EQUALITY

8
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES

12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION

14
LIFE BELOW WATER

16
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS


