A Comparison of Team Performance Measures for Global Software Development Student Teams

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2009

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ieee Computer Soc

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

One of the most difficult tasks for global software development researchers is quantifying the performance of groups and students who participate in these distributed projects [30]. There has been much debate about which factors better correlate with team performance and which best describe a successful team. The purpose of this paper is to compare the different approaches that have been used to evaluate the performance of global software learners and show how these techniques can affect research results. Using data from student groups engaged in global software development projects for the past year, the authors apply a number of different assessment methods and show their effects on different performance indicators. Our study suggests that the selection of appropriate measures to evaluate team performance can dramatically affect how one identifies successful teams.

Description

Alpaslan, Ferda Nur/0000-0002-9806-1543

Keywords

[No Keyword Available]

Turkish CoHE Thesis Center URL

Fields of Science

0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
10

Source

4th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering -- JUL 13-16, 2009 -- Limerick, IRELAND

Volume

Issue

Start Page

267

End Page

+

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 7

Scopus : 10

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 25

Web of Science™ Citations

4

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Feb 03, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
6.02354769

Sustainable Development Goals

3

GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING Logo

4

QUALITY EDUCATION
QUALITY EDUCATION Logo

5

GENDER EQUALITY
GENDER EQUALITY Logo

8

DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Logo

9

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Logo

10

REDUCED INEQUALITIES
REDUCED INEQUALITIES Logo

12

RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Logo

14

LIFE BELOW WATER
LIFE BELOW WATER Logo

16

PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS
PEACE, JUSTICE AND STRONG INSTITUTIONS Logo