Lessons Learned From Four Recent Turkish Earthquakes: Sivrice-Elazığ, Aegean Sea, and Dual Kahramanmaraş

dc.contributor.author Tunc, Goekhan
dc.contributor.author Mertol, Halit Cenan
dc.contributor.author Akis, Tolga
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-05T15:23:13Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-05T15:23:13Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.description Tunc, Gokhan/0000-0002-8307-1060 en_US
dc.description.abstract T & uuml;rkiye is located in an earthquake-prone region where almost all of its population resides in risky areas. In the past 100 years, there has been a strong earthquake every two years and a major one every 3 years. This study investigates the impact of four recent earthquakes, that occurred between 2020 and 2023, on reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. The first, Sivrice-Elaz & imath;& gbreve;, struck the eastern part of T & uuml;rkiye on January 24, 2020, with a moment magnitude of Mw = 6.8. The second, the Aegean Sea, hit the western part of the country on October 30, 2020, with an Mw of 6.6. The third and fourth are the February 6, 2023 dual Kahramanmara & scedil; earthquakes with Mws of 7.7 and 7.6, which struck the eastern part of T & uuml;rkiye approximately 9 h apart. Immediately following these earthquakes, a technical team investigated each of the damaged areas. This study summarizes their findings on RC buildings. It was discovered that the majority of the collapsed or severely damaged RC buildings were constructed before 2000. The main reasons for this included technological limitations, specifically on producing high-quality concrete, as well as a lack of public policies and enforced laws in the construction sector to maintain an acceptable international standard. Furthermore, the damage patterns of buildings from these four earthquakes indicated poor workmanship, low material quality, improper structural framing, a common appearance of soft and weak stories, the inadequate use of shear walls, and defective reinforcement configuration. The significance of soil studies and the enforcement of building inspections are also discussed, along with the earthquake codes. The study concludes that the maximum peak ground accelerations from the dual Kahramanmara & scedil; earthquakes were almost triple the code-prescribed values. Therefore, it is recommended that the current mapped spectral acceleration values be revised and that buildings constructed before 2000 should be prioritized while determining their structural performances. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Atilim University en_US
dc.description.sponsorship No Statement Available en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11069-024-06687-x
dc.identifier.issn 0921-030X
dc.identifier.issn 1573-0840
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85193973492
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06687-x
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2283
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Natural Hazards
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Earthquakes en_US
dc.subject Reinforced concrete buildings en_US
dc.subject Structural damage patterns en_US
dc.subject Earthquake performance en_US
dc.subject T & uuml en_US
dc.subject rkiye en_US
dc.title Lessons Learned From Four Recent Turkish Earthquakes: Sivrice-Elazığ, Aegean Sea, and Dual Kahramanmaraş en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.id Tunc, Gokhan/0000-0002-8307-1060
gdc.author.scopusid 6603220627
gdc.author.scopusid 31767605700
gdc.author.scopusid 55144319800
gdc.author.wosid Tunc, Gokhan/T-8015-2017
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.description.department Atılım University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tunc, Goekhan; Mertol, Halit Cenan; Akis, Tolga] Atilim Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Ankara, Turkiye en_US
gdc.description.endpage 12373
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.scopusquality Q1
gdc.description.startpage 12341
gdc.description.volume 120
gdc.description.wosquality Q1
gdc.identifier.openalex W4398235481
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001230099200001
gdc.oaire.accesstype HYBRID
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 7.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.7164149E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 7.8157685E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0211 other engineering and technologies
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 12.041979
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.96
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 3
gdc.plumx.mendeley 11
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 7
gdc.scopus.citedcount 7
gdc.virtual.author Mertol, Halit Cenan
gdc.virtual.author Akış, Tolga
gdc.wos.citedcount 5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 0f3a1cd1-cb53-413f-9d5d-0032b54031f9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication c5c8784e-c129-499c-8a15-85aa6cf5ce96
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0f3a1cd1-cb53-413f-9d5d-0032b54031f9
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 4abda634-67fd-417f-bee6-59c29fc99997
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 50be38c5-40c4-4d5f-b8e6-463e9514c6dd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 01fb4c5b-b45f-40c0-9a74-f0b3b6265a0d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lessons learned from four recent Turkish earthquakes.pdf
Size:
8.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections