A Novel Comparison of Shrinkage Methods Based on Multi Criteria Decision Making in Case of Multicollinearity

Loading...

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Streszczenie. Data analysis is very important in many fields of science. The most preferred methods in data analysis is linear regression due to its simplicity to interpret and ease of application. One of the assumptions accepted while obtaining linear regression is that there is no correlation between the independent variables in the model which refers to absence of multicollinearity. As a result of multicollinearity, the variance of the parameter estimates will be high and this reduces the accuracy and reliability of the linear models. Shrinkage methods aim to handle the multicollinearity problem by minimizing the variance of the estimators in linear model. Ridge Regression, Lasso, and Elastic-Net methods are applied to different simulated data sets with different characteristics and also real world data sets. Based on performance results, the methods are compared according to multi-criteria decision making method named TOPSIS, and the order of preference is determined for each data set. © (2024), (American Institute of Mathematical Sciences). All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

elastic net, lasso, multi criteria decision making, Multicollinearity, ridge regression, shrinkage methods, TOPSIS, Ridge regression; shrinkage estimators (Lasso), Linear regression; mixed models, multi criteria decision making, shrinkage methods, ridge regression, multicollinearity, Lasso, TOPSIS, elastic net, Multi-objective and goal programming

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
3

Volume

20

Issue

12

Start Page

3816

End Page

3842

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 5

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 7

SCOPUS™ Citations

5

checked on Jun 02, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

3

checked on Jun 02, 2026

Page Views

9

checked on Jun 02, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
3.01

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available