Comparative assessment of electromagnetic simulation tools for use in microstrip antenna design: Experimental demonstrations

dc.authoridKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619
dc.authorscopusid57201858332
dc.authorscopusid57201855036
dc.authorscopusid7102824862
dc.authorscopusid56217996200
dc.authorwosidKara, Ali/R-8038-2019
dc.contributor.authorBilgin, Gulsima
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Vadi Su
dc.contributor.authorKara, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Elif
dc.contributor.otherElectrical-Electronics Engineering
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-05T15:28:19Z
dc.date.available2024-07-05T15:28:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentAtılım Universityen_US
dc.department-temp[Bilgin, Gulsima; Yilmaz, Vadi Su; Kara, Ali; Aydin, Elif] Atilim Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.descriptionKara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a better understanding of the use of finite integration techniques (FIT) and finite element method (FEM) in different types of microstrip antennas in order to determine which numerical method gives relatively more accurate results. Although the theoretical formulation based on Maxwell's equations of both FEM and FIT are approached from different aspects in the literature, there is still a lack of comparison of the same antenna type using different numerical methods employing FEM and FIT. Therefore, in this study, FEM and FIT were applied to two different types of microstrip antennas, and their simulation and experimental results was compared. For the first antenna demonstration, a multilayer structure was chosen to achieve one of the significant parameters. Then, a microstrip antenna with a compact structure was used in the second demonstration. Using these two antennas, the accuracy of FEM and FIT in different structures were compared and all simulated return loss and gain results were verified by the measured results. The experimental demonstrations show that FEM performs better for both types of microstrip antennas while FIT provides an adequate result for two-layer microstrip antennas.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu [116E216]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu, Grant/Award Number: 116E216en_US
dc.identifier.citation6
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mop.31563
dc.identifier.endpage356en_US
dc.identifier.issn0895-2477
dc.identifier.issn1098-2760
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058124882
dc.identifier.startpage349en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/mop.31563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14411/2776
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000455510000011
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.institutionauthorYılmaz, Vadi Su
dc.institutionauthorBilgin, Gülsima
dc.institutionauthorKara, Ali
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Elif
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcompact antennaen_US
dc.subjectFEMen_US
dc.subjectFITen_US
dc.subjectmicrostrip antennasen_US
dc.subjectmultilayer antennaen_US
dc.titleComparative assessment of electromagnetic simulation tools for use in microstrip antenna design: Experimental demonstrationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbafca312-fb0f-495b-b33d-53b66835980a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication44168b7e-9433-4f10-9355-14294d208caf
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbe728837-c599-49c1-8e8d-81b90219bb15
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1d7a7c27-e329-4a72-b120-fae3e2d529b6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybafca312-fb0f-495b-b33d-53b66835980a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication032f8aca-54a7-476c-b399-6f26feb20a7d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc3c9b34a-b165-4cd6-8959-dc25e91e206b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery032f8aca-54a7-476c-b399-6f26feb20a7d

Files

Collections