Comparative Assessment of Electromagnetic Simulation Tools for Use in Microstrip Antenna Design: Experimental Demonstrations
Loading...

Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper presents a better understanding of the use of finite integration techniques (FIT) and finite element method (FEM) in different types of microstrip antennas in order to determine which numerical method gives relatively more accurate results. Although the theoretical formulation based on Maxwell's equations of both FEM and FIT are approached from different aspects in the literature, there is still a lack of comparison of the same antenna type using different numerical methods employing FEM and FIT. Therefore, in this study, FEM and FIT were applied to two different types of microstrip antennas, and their simulation and experimental results was compared. For the first antenna demonstration, a multilayer structure was chosen to achieve one of the significant parameters. Then, a microstrip antenna with a compact structure was used in the second demonstration. Using these two antennas, the accuracy of FEM and FIT in different structures were compared and all simulated return loss and gain results were verified by the measured results. The experimental demonstrations show that FEM performs better for both types of microstrip antennas while FIT provides an adequate result for two-layer microstrip antennas.
Description
Kara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619
ORCID
Keywords
compact antenna, FEM, FIT, microstrip antennas, multilayer antenna
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Q4
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
Microwave and Optical Technology Letters
Volume
61
Issue
2
Start Page
349
End Page
356
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 6
Scopus : 9
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
SCOPUS™ Citations
9
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 10, 2026
Google Scholar™


