Comparative Assessment of Electromagnetic Simulation Tools for Use in Microstrip Antenna Design: Experimental Demonstrations

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2019

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper presents a better understanding of the use of finite integration techniques (FIT) and finite element method (FEM) in different types of microstrip antennas in order to determine which numerical method gives relatively more accurate results. Although the theoretical formulation based on Maxwell's equations of both FEM and FIT are approached from different aspects in the literature, there is still a lack of comparison of the same antenna type using different numerical methods employing FEM and FIT. Therefore, in this study, FEM and FIT were applied to two different types of microstrip antennas, and their simulation and experimental results was compared. For the first antenna demonstration, a multilayer structure was chosen to achieve one of the significant parameters. Then, a microstrip antenna with a compact structure was used in the second demonstration. Using these two antennas, the accuracy of FEM and FIT in different structures were compared and all simulated return loss and gain results were verified by the measured results. The experimental demonstrations show that FEM performs better for both types of microstrip antennas while FIT provides an adequate result for two-layer microstrip antennas.

Description

Kara, Ali/0000-0002-9739-7619

Keywords

compact antenna, FEM, FIT, microstrip antennas, multilayer antenna

Fields of Science

0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

Q3
OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
7

Source

Microwave and Optical Technology Letters

Volume

61

Issue

2

Start Page

349

End Page

356

Collections

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 6

Scopus : 9

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 7

SCOPUS™ Citations

9

checked on Feb 10, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

6

checked on Feb 10, 2026

Page Views

2

checked on Feb 10, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.87470905

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available