Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Entities
Browse GCRIS
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Guzel, Nevin Atalay"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 1
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain
    (Mosby-elsevier, 2024) Acet, Nagihan; Guzel, Nevin Atalay; Gunendi, Zafer
    Objective: This study investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on balance and cervical proprioception in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving a 3-week treatment protocol for which 66 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Both groups underwent conventional physiotherapy (hot pack and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) twice a week for 3 weeks along with additional cervical mobilization in the mobilization group, and sham mobilization in the sham control group. Static and dynamic balance, cervical proprioception, cervical mobility, and pain intensity were evaluated using a Kinesthetic Skill Training System 3000 device, the "Joint Position Error Test," Cervical Range-of-Motion Instrument, and the visual analog scale, respectively. Results: After treatment, significant improvements were noted in dynamic balance, mobility, pain intensity (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively), and proprioception in the left direction of rotation in the mobilization group (P = .003) that were significantly greater than those observed in the sham mobilization group (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .003, respectively). Although a significant decrease was observed in the deficits of static balance (P = .044) and proprioception in the right direction of rotation (P = .011) after mobilization, the changes were similar in both the mobilization and sham mobilization groups (P = .192, P = .154, respectively). Conclusion: Cervical mobilization led to significant improvements in dynamic balance, pain intensity, mobility, and partial improvements to proprioception in a comparison with a sham mobilization group, while the effect on static balance was not significant.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH
OpenAIRE Logo
OpenDOAR Logo
Jisc Open Policy Finder Logo
Harman Logo
Base Logo
OAI Logo
Handle System Logo
ROAR Logo
ROARMAP Logo
Google Scholar Logo

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback